Literature DB >> 22391946

Safety of multi-channel stimulation implants: a single blocking capacitor per channel is not sufficient after single-fault failure.

Antoine Nonclercq1, Laurent Lonys, Anne Vanhoestenberghe, Andreas Demosthenous, Nick Donaldson.   

Abstract

One reason given for placing capacitors in series with stimulation electrodes is that they prevent direct current flow and therefore tissue damage under fault conditions. We show that this is not true for multiplexed multi-channel stimulators with one capacitor per channel. A test bench of two stimulation channels, two stimulation tripoles and a saline bath was used to measure the direct current flowing through the electrodes under two different single fault conditions. The electrodes were passively discharged between stimulation pulses. For the particular condition used (16 mA, 1 ms stimulation pulse at 20 Hz with electrodes placed 5 cm apart), the current ranged from 38 to 326 μA depending on the type of fault. The variation of the fault current with time, stimulation amplitude, stimulation frequency and distance between the electrodes is given. Possible additional methods to improve safety are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391946     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0889-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  15 in total

1.  BION system for distributed neural prosthetic interfaces.

Authors:  G E Loeb; R A Peck; W H Moore; K Hood
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  BION microstimulators: a case study in the engineering of an electronic implantable medical device.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Paul P Breen; Fabio Quondamatteo; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  A Butterwick; A Vankov; P Huie; Y Freyvert; D Palanker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  An Integrated Implantable Stimulator That is Fail-Safe Without Off-Chip Blocking-Capacitors.

Authors:  A Demosthenous; N Donaldson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.833

6.  When are actively balanced biphasic ('Lilly') stimulating pulses necessary in a neurological prosthesis? II. pH changes; noxious products; electrode corrosion; discussion.

Authors:  N D Donaldson; P E Donaldson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo.

Authors:  C Q Huang; R K Shepherd; P M Carter; P M Seligman; B Tabor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control in paraplegia.

Authors:  G S Brindley; C E Polkey; D N Rushton
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1982-12

9.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation: finite element analysis of the electric field and current density.

Authors:  Gabriel R Hernández-Labrado; José L Polo; Elisa López-Dolado; Jorge E Collazos-Castro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Dose-response study of the pathological effects of chronically applied direct current stimulation on the normal rat spinal cord.

Authors:  R J Hurlbert; C H Tator; E Theriault
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does a coupling capacitor enhance the charge balance during neural stimulation? An empirical study.

Authors:  Marijn N van Dongen; Wouter A Serdijn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.