Literature DB >> 11931316

Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination.

Jennifer J Lentz1, Marjorie R Leek.   

Abstract

The ability to discriminate between sounds with different spectral shapes was evaluated for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Listeners detected a 920-Hz tone added in phase to a single component of a standard consisting of the sum of five tones spaced equally on a logarithmic frequency scale ranging from 200 to 4200 Hz. An overall level randomization of 10 dB was either present or absent. In one subset of conditions, the no-perturbation conditions, the standard stimulus was the sum of equal-amplitude tones. In the perturbation conditions, the amplitudes of the components within a stimulus were randomly altered on every presentation. For both perturbation and no-perturbation conditions, thresholds for the detection of the 920-Hz tone were measured to compare sensitivity to changes in spectral shape between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. To assess whether hearing-impaired listeners relied on different regions of the spectrum to discriminate between sounds, spectral weights were estimated from the perturbed standards by correlating the listener's responses with the level differences per component across two intervals of a two-alternative forced-choice task. Results showed that hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners had similar sensitivity to changes in spectral shape. On average, across-frequency correlation functions also were similar for both groups of listeners, suggesting that as long as all components are audible and well separated in frequency, hearing-impaired listeners can use information across frequency as well as normal-hearing listeners. Analysis of the individual data revealed, however, that normal-hearing listeners may be better able to adopt optimal weighting schemes. This conclusion is only tentative, as differences in internal noise may need to be considered to interpret the results obtained from weighting studies between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931316     DOI: 10.1121/1.1451066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Michelle Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-25

2.  Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  How Do Age and Hearing Loss Impact Spectral Envelope Perception?

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral tilt change in stop consonant perception by listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Aniket Saoji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.