Literature DB >> 11206164

Channel weights for speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

M A Mehr1, C W Turner, A Parkinson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a method of estimating the relative "weight" that a multichannel cochlear implant user places on individual channels, indicating its contribution to overall speech recognition. The correlational method as applied to speech recognition was used both with normal-hearing listeners and with cochlear implant users fitted with six-channel speech processors. Speech was divided into frequency bands corresponding to the bands of the processor and a randomly chosen level of corresponding filtered noise was added to each channel on each trial. Channels in which the signal-to-noise ratio was more highly correlated with performance have higher weights, and conversely, channels in which the correlations were smaller have lower weights. Normal-hearing listeners showed approximately equal weights across frequency bands. In contrast, cochlear implant users showed unequal weighting across bands, and varied from individual to individual with some channels apparently not contributing significantly to speech recognition. To validate these channel weights, individual channels were removed and speech recognition in quiet was tested. A strong correlation was found between the relative weight of the channel removed and the decrease in speech recognition, thus providing support for use of the correlational method for cochlear implant users.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11206164     DOI: 10.1121/1.1322021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Band importance functions of listeners with cochlear implants using clinical maps.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Use of an adaptive-bandwidth protocol to measure importance functions for simulated cochlear implant frequency channels.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.