Literature DB >> 23967950

Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.

Frédéric Apoux1, Sarah E Yoho, Carla L Youngdahl, Eric W Healy.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the role and relative contribution of envelope and temporal fine structure (TFS) to sentence recognition in noise. Target and masker stimuli were added at five different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and filtered into 30 contiguous frequency bands. The envelope and TFS were extracted from each band by Hilbert decomposition. The final stimuli consisted of the envelope of the target/masker sound mixture at x dB SNR and the TFS of the same sound mixture at y dB SNR. A first experiment showed a very limited contribution of TFS cues, indicating that sentence recognition in noise relies almost exclusively on temporal envelope cues. A second experiment showed that replacing the carrier of a sound mixture with noise (vocoder processing) cannot be considered equivalent to disrupting the TFS of the target signal by adding a background noise. Accordingly, a re-evaluation of the vocoder approach as a model to further understand the role of TFS cues in noisy situations may be necessary. Overall, these data are consistent with the view that speech information is primarily extracted from the envelope while TFS cues are primarily used to detect glimpses of the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967950      PMCID: PMC3765279          DOI: 10.1121/1.4816413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Kaibao Nie; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of a correlational method to estimate a listener's weighting function for speech.

Authors:  K A Doherty; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral restoration of speech: intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps.

Authors:  R M Warren; K R Hainsworth; B S Brubaker; J A Bashford; E W Healy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-02

7.  Auditory induction: perceptual synthesis of absent sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren; C J Obusek; J M Ackroff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.

Authors:  A S Bregman; J Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-08

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality.

Authors:  H J Steeneken; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Level considerations for chimeric processing: Temporal envelope and fine structure contributions to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jenine L Entwistle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Masood Delfarah; Jordan L Vasko; Brittney L Carter; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

5.  Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.

Authors:  Beier Qi; Yitao Mao; Jiaxing Liu; Bo Liu; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Role of short-time acoustic temporal fine structure cues in sentence recognition for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Limin Hou; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.