Literature DB >> 21311735

Efficiency of the Human Observer Compared to an Ideal Observer Based on a Generalized NEQ Which Incorporates Scatter and Geometric Unsharpness: Evaluation with a 2AFC Experiment.

Iacovos S Kyprianou1, Arundhuti Ganguly, Stephen Rudin, Daniel R Bednarek, Brandon D Gallas, Kyle J Myers.   

Abstract

Under certain assumptions the detectability of the ideal observer can be defined as the integral of the system Noise Equivalent Quanta multiplied by the squared object spatial frequency distribution. Using the detector Noise-Equivalent-Quanta (NEQ(D)) for the calculation of detectability inadequately describes the performance of an x-ray imaging system because it does not take into account the effects of patient scatter and geometric unsharpness. As a result, the ideal detectability index is overestimated, and hence the efficiency of the human observer in detecting objects is underestimated. We define a Generalized-NEQ (GNEQ) for an x-ray system referenced at the object plane that incorporates the scatter fraction, the spatial distributions of scatter and focal spot, the detector MTF(D), and the detector Normalized-Noise-Power-Spectrum (NNPS(D)). This GNEQ was used in the definition of the ideal detectability for the evaluation of the human observer efficiency during a two Alternative Forced Choice (2-AFC) experiment, and was compared with the case where only the NEQ(D) was used in the detectability calculations. The 2-AFC experiment involved the detection of images of polyethylene tubes (diameters between 100-300 μm) filled with iodine contrast (concentrations between 0-120 mg/cm(3)) placed onto a uniform head equivalent phantom placed near the surface of a microangiographic detector (43 μm pixel size). The resulting efficiency of the human observer without regarding the effects of scatter and geometric unsharpness was 30%. When these effects were considered the efficiency was increased to 70%. The ideal observer with the GNEQ can be a simple optimization method of a complete imaging system.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 21311735      PMCID: PMC3035383          DOI: 10.1117/12.595870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  32 in total

1.  Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  S V Beiden; R F Wagner; G Campbell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography.

Authors:  V N Cooper; J M Boone; J A Seibert; C J Pellot-Barakat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. II. Cascade model analysis.

Authors:  Arundhuti Ganguly; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  X-ray images of small blood vessels in angiography: question of isoplanatism.

Authors:  K Doi; K Rossmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1975 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Study of the Generalized MTF and DQE for a New Microangiographic System.

Authors:  Iacovos S Kyprianou; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2004-05-06

7.  Comparison of convolution and ray-tracing methods for computing small blood vessel images in angiography.

Authors:  K Koi; K Rossmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 6. MTFs of II-TV digital imaging systems.

Authors:  H Fujita; K Doi; M L Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effect of reduced scatter on radiographic information content and patient exposure: a quantitative demonstration.

Authors:  R F Wagner; G T Barnes; B S Askins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods.

Authors:  A E Burgess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Technical evaluation of a clinical, bi-planar, digital and upright X-ray imaging unit.

Authors:  Charlotte Kelly; Ioannis Delakis
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-06-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.