Literature DB >> 19011189

Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.

Ehsan Samei1, Nicole T Ranger, Alistair MacKenzie, Ian D Honey, James T Dobbins, Carl E Ravin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an experimental method for measuring the effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) of digital radiographic imaging systems and evaluate its use in select imaging systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A geometric phantom emulating the attenuation and scatter properties of the adult human thorax was employed to assess eight imaging systems in a total of nine configurations. The noise power spectrum (NPS) was derived from images of the phantom acquired at three exposure levels spanning the operating range of the system. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured by using an edge device positioned at the anterior surface of the phantom. Scatter measurements were made by using a beam-stop technique. All measurements, including those of phantom attenuation and estimates of x-ray flux, were used to compute the eDQE.
RESULTS: The MTF results showed notable degradation owing to focal spot blur. Scatter fractions ranged between 11% and 56%, depending on the system. The eDQE(0) results ranged from 1%-17%, indicating a reduction of up to one order of magnitude and different rank ordering and performance among systems, compared with that implied in reported conventional detective quantum efficiency results from the same systems.
CONCLUSION: The eDQE method was easy to implement, yielded reproducible results, and provided a meaningful reflection of system performance by quantifying image quality in a clinically relevant context. The difference in the magnitude of the measured eDQE and the ideal eDQE of 100% provides a great opportunity for improving the image quality of radiographic and mammographic systems while reducing patient dose. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19011189      PMCID: PMC2691810          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492071734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Robert S Saunders; Joseph Y Lo; James T Dobbins; Jonathan L Jesneck; Carey E Floyd; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo; Terry T Yoshizumi; Jonathan L Jesneck; James T Dobbins; Carey E Floyd; H Page McAdams; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.

Authors:  Hartmut Illers; Egbert Buhr; Christoph Hoeschen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.

Authors:  Sarah J Boyce; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.

Authors:  P Monnin; D Gutierrez; S Bulling; D Guntern; F R Verdun
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantitative scatter measurement in digital radiography using a photostimulable phosphor imaging system.

Authors:  C E Floyd; J Y Lo; H G Chotas; C E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Study of the Generalized MTF and DQE for a New Microangiographic System.

Authors:  Iacovos S Kyprianou; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2004-05-06

8.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; D A Reimann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Scatter rejection by air gaps in diagnostic radiology. Calculations using a Monte Carlo collision density method and consideration of molecular interference in coherent scattering.

Authors:  J Persliden; G A Carlsson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations.

Authors:  B J Conway; P F Butler; J E Duff; T R Fewell; R E Gross; R J Jennings; G H Koustenis; J L McCrohan; F G Rueter; C K Showalter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and dose to optimize radiographic technical parameters: a survey of pediatric chest X-ray examinations in Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Suk Park; Ye-Seul Kim; Ok-Seob Park; Sang-Tae Kim; Chang-Woo Jeon; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Quality-controlled dose reduction of full-leg radiography in patients with knee malalignment.

Authors:  Jost Karsten Kloth; Regina Neumann; Eva von Stillfried; Wolfram Stiller; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Volker Ewerbeck; Marc-André Weber
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  New Software for DQE Calculation in Digital Mammography Compliant with IEC 62220-1-2.

Authors:  Magdalena Dobrzyńska; Anna Wysocka-Rabin; Ewa Fabiszewska; Katarzyna Pasicz; Witold Skrzyński
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.903

5.  Evaluation of Non-Uniform Image Quality Caused by Anode Heel Effect in Digital Radiography Using Mutual Information.

Authors:  Ming-Chung Chou
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.