Literature DB >> 21307050

Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion.

F J Calabro1, S Soto-Faraco, L M Vaina.   

Abstract

In humans, as well as most animal species, perception of object motion is critical to successful interaction with the surrounding environment. Yet, as the observer also moves, the retinal projections of the various motion components add to each other and extracting accurate object motion becomes computationally challenging. Recent psychophysical studies have demonstrated that observers use a flow-parsing mechanism to estimate and subtract self-motion from the optic flow field. We investigated whether concurrent acoustic cues for motion can facilitate visual flow parsing, thereby enhancing the detection of moving objects during simulated self-motion. Participants identified an object (the target) that moved either forward or backward within a visual scene containing nine identical textured objects simulating forward observer translation. We found that spatially co-localized, directionally congruent, moving auditory stimuli enhanced object motion detection. Interestingly, subjects who performed poorly on the visual-only task benefited more from the addition of moving auditory stimuli. When auditory stimuli were not co-localized to the visual target, improvements in detection rates were weak. Taken together, these results suggest that parsing object motion from self-motion-induced optic flow can operate on multisensory object representations. This journal is
© 2011 The Royal Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21307050      PMCID: PMC3145189          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  45 in total

1.  Hearing visual motion in depth.

Authors:  Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The ventriloquist in motion: illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jessica Lyons; Michael Gazzaniga; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

4.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neural correlates of coherent audiovisual motion perception.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Capture of auditory motion by vision is represented by an activation shift from auditory to visual motion cortex.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Wolf Singer; Lars Muckli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Filtering by movement in visual search.

Authors:  P McLeod; J Driver; Z Dienes; J Crisp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Multisensory-based approach to the recovery of unisensory deficit.

Authors:  Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Characteristic sounds facilitate visual search.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

10.  Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  16 in total

1.  Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Melissa S Parade; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Interaction of cortical networks mediating object motion detection by moving observers.

Authors:  F J Calabro; L M Vaina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural activity underlying the detection of an object movement by an observer during forward self-motion: Dynamic decoding and temporal evolution of directional cortical connectivity.

Authors:  N Kozhemiako; A S Nunes; A Samal; K D Rana; F J Calabro; M S Hämäläinen; S Khan; L M Vaina
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Humans navigate with stereo olfaction.

Authors:  Yuli Wu; Kepu Chen; Yuting Ye; Tao Zhang; Wen Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Does optic flow parsing depend on prior estimation of heading?

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton; Andrew J Foulkes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Vestibular facilitation of optic flow parsing.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Zhou Zhang; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditory cues facilitate object movement processing in human extrastriate visual cortex during simulated self-motion: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Finnegan J Calabro; Abhisek Samal; Kunjan D Rana; Fahimeh Mamashli; Sheraz Khan; Matti Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.610

8.  Guiding locomotion in complex, dynamic environments.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Differential responses in dorsal visual cortex to motion and disparity depth cues.

Authors:  David M Arnoldussen; Jeroen Goossens; Albert V van den Berg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A fast statistical significance test for baseline correction and comparative analysis in phase locking.

Authors:  Kunjan D Rana; Lucia M Vaina; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.