Literature DB >> 16143858

Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Georg F Meyer1, Sophie M Wuerger, Florian Röhrbein, Christoph Zetzsche.   

Abstract

It is well known that the detection thresholds for stationary auditory and visual signals are lower if the signals are presented bimodally rather than unimodally, provided the signals coincide in time and space. Recent work on auditory-visual motion detection suggests that the facilitation seen for stationary signals is not seen for motion signals. We investigate the conditions under which motion perception also benefits from the integration of auditory and visual signals. We show that the integration of cross-modal local motion signals that are matched in position and speed is consistent with thresholds predicted by a neural summation model. If the signals are presented in different hemi-fields, move in different directions, or both, then behavioural thresholds are predicted by a probability-summation model. We conclude that cross-modal signals have to be co-localised and co-incident for effective motion integration. We also argue that facilitation is only seen if the signals contain all localisation cues that would be produced by physical objects.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16143858     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2394-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Spiral mechanisms are required to account for summation of complex motion components.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Stephen J Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The ventriloquist in motion: illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jessica Lyons; Michael Gazzaniga; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

4.  The integration of auditory and visual motion signals at threshold.

Authors:  S M Wuerger; M Hofbauer; G F Meyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11

5.  No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

6.  Spatial determinants of multisensory integration in cat superior colliculus neurons.

Authors:  M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus of the alert cat.

Authors:  M T Wallace; M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

9.  Development of multisensory neurons and multisensory integration in cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain.

Authors:  R J Howard; M Brammer; I Wright; P W Woodruff; E T Bullmore; S Zeki
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  35 in total

1.  Predicting the position of moving audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multi-sensory integration of spatio-temporal segmentation cues: one plus one does not always equal two.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Victoria Wong; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensitive period for a multimodal response in human visual motion area MT/MST.

Authors:  Marina Bedny; Talia Konkle; Kevin Pelphrey; Rebecca Saxe; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Audiotactile interactions beyond the space and body parts around the head.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Yukiomi Nozoe; Kaoru Sekiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The benefit of multisensory integration with biological motion signals.

Authors:  Catarina Mendonça; Jorge A Santos; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Knut Drewing; Denise Y P Henriques; Frank Rösler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Audio-visual speech cue combination.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Morgan Tear; Ryan Schindel; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural correlates of audiovisual motion capture.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.