Literature DB >> 32446882

Neural activity underlying the detection of an object movement by an observer during forward self-motion: Dynamic decoding and temporal evolution of directional cortical connectivity.

N Kozhemiako1, A S Nunes2, A Samal3, K D Rana4, F J Calabro5, M S Hämäläinen6, S Khan7, L M Vaina8.   

Abstract

Relatively little is known about how the human brain identifies movement of objects while the observer is also moving in the environment. This is, ecologically, one of the most fundamental motion processing problems, critical for survival. To study this problem, we used a task which involved nine textured spheres moving in depth, eight simulating the observer's forward motion while the ninth, the target, moved independently with a different speed towards or away from the observer. Capitalizing on the high temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) we trained a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) using the sensor-level data to identify correct and incorrect responses. Using the same MEG data, we addressed the dynamics of cortical processes involved in the detection of the independently moving object and investigated whether we could obtain confirmatory evidence for the brain activity patterns used by the classifier. Our findings indicate that response correctness could be reliably predicted by the SVC, with the highest accuracy during the blank period after motion and preceding the response. The spatial distribution of the areas critical for the correct prediction was similar but not exclusive to areas underlying the evoked activity. Importantly, SVC identified frontal areas otherwise not detected with evoked activity that seem to be important for the successful performance in the task. Dynamic connectivity further supported the involvement of frontal and occipital-temporal areas during the task periods. This is the first study to dynamically map cortical areas using a fully data-driven approach in order to investigate the neural mechanisms involved in the detection of moving objects during observer's self-motion.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic Granger causality; Flow parsing; Magnetoencephalography; Neural decoding; Optic flow

Year:  2020        PMID: 32446882      PMCID: PMC7680311          DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  87 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer J Vogel; Clint A Bowers; David S Vogel
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

4.  Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Dale; B Fischl; M I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Gamma Oscillations Underlie the Maintenance of Feature-Specific Information and the Contents of Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Roosa Honkanen; Santeri Rouhinen; Sheng H Wang; J Matias Palva; Satu Palva
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Delay-related activity of prefrontal neurons in rhesus monkeys performing delayed response.

Authors:  S Kojima; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-09-23       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Jochen Kaiser; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Neuronal mechanisms for detection of motion in the field of view.

Authors:  Claudio Galletti; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Human V6: functional characterisation and localisation.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Rachael Sherrington; Lara Hemsworth; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory cues facilitate object movement processing in human extrastriate visual cortex during simulated self-motion: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Finnegan J Calabro; Abhisek Samal; Kunjan D Rana; Fahimeh Mamashli; Sheraz Khan; Matti Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.610

2.  Contextual MEG and EEG Source Estimates Using Spatiotemporal LSTM Networks.

Authors:  Christoph Dinh; John G Samuelsson; Alexander Hunold; Matti S Hämäläinen; Sheraz Khan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.