Literature DB >> 23887048

Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance.

Brett R Fajen1, Melissa S Parade, Jonathan S Matthis.   

Abstract

A fundamental question about locomotion in the presence of moving objects is whether movements are guided based upon perceived object motion in an observer-centered or world-centered reference frame. The former captures object motion relative to the moving observer and depends on both observer and object motion. The latter captures object motion relative to the stationary environment and is independent of observer motion. Subjects walked through a virtual environment (VE) viewed through a head-mounted display and indicated whether they would pass in front of or behind a moving obstacle that was on course to cross their future path. Subjects' movement through the VE was manipulated such that object motion in observer coordinates was affected while object motion in world coordinates was the same. We found that when moving observers choose routes around moving obstacles, they rely on object motion perceived in world coordinates. This entails a process, which has been called flow parsing (Rushton & Warren, 2005; Warren & Rushton, 2009a), that recovers the component of optic flow due to object motion independent of self-motion. We found that when self-motion is real and actively generated, the process by which object motion is recovered relies on both visual and nonvisual information to factor out the influence of self-motion. The remaining component contains information about object motion in world coordinates that is needed to guide locomotion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flow parsing; locomotion; moving objects; obstacle avoidance; optic flow

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887048      PMCID: PMC3726133          DOI: 10.1167/13.8.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  34 in total

1.  The brain weights body-based cues higher than vision when estimating walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Patrick Byrne; Hong-Jin Sun
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Depth perception by the active observer.

Authors:  Mark Wexler; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  World-centered perception of 3D object motion during visually guided self-motion.

Authors:  Kazumichi Matsumiya; Hiroshi Ando
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Perceiving a stable environment when one moves.

Authors:  H Wallach
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Gabriel Diaz; Christopher Cramer
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Hugo Bruggeman; Wendy Zosh; William H Warren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Rate of change of angular bearing as the relevant property in a horizontal interception task during locomotion.

Authors:  Matthieu Lenoir; Eliane Musch; Evert Thiery; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Vestibular facilitation of optic flow parsing.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Zhou Zhang; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Jonathan Samir Matthis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  How cognitive heuristics can explain social interactions in spatial movement.

Authors:  Michael J Seitz; Nikolai W F Bode; Gerta Köster
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Perception of object motion during self-motion: Correlated biases in judgments of heading direction and object motion.

Authors:  Xing Xing; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  A neural mechanism for detecting object motion during self-motion.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Multisensory Integration of Visual and Vestibular Signals Improves Heading Discrimination in the Presence of a Moving Object.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Guiding locomotion in complex, dynamic environments.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Development of Visual Motion Perception for Prospective Control: Brain and Behavioral Studies in Infants.

Authors:  Seth B Agyei; F R Ruud van der Weel; Audrey L H van der Meer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09

10.  How do treadmill speed and terrain visibility influence neuromuscular control of guinea fowl locomotion?

Authors:  Joanne C Gordon; Jeffery W Rankin; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.