Literature DB >> 33882297

Auditory cues facilitate object movement processing in human extrastriate visual cortex during simulated self-motion: A pilot study.

Lucia M Vaina1, Finnegan J Calabro2, Abhisek Samal3, Kunjan D Rana3, Fahimeh Mamashli4, Sheraz Khan4, Matti Hämäläinen4, Seppo P Ahlfors4, Jyrki Ahveninen5.   

Abstract

Visual segregation of moving objects is a considerable computational challenge when the observer moves through space. Recent psychophysical studies suggest that directionally congruent, moving auditory cues can substantially improve parsing object motion in such settings, but the exact brain mechanisms and visual processing stages that mediate these effects are still incompletely known. Here, we utilized multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA) of MRI-informed magnetoencephalography (MEG) source estimates to examine how crossmodal auditory cues facilitate motion detection during the observer's self-motion. During MEG recordings, participants identified a target object that moved either forward or backward within a visual scene that included nine identically textured objects simulating forward observer translation. Auditory motion cues 1) improved the behavioral accuracy of target localization, 2) significantly modulated the MEG source activity in the areas V2 and human middle temporal complex (hMT+), and 3) increased the accuracy at which the target movement direction could be decoded from hMT+ activity using MVPA. The increase of decoding accuracy by auditory cues in hMT+ was significant also when superior temporal activations in or near auditory cortices were regressed out from the hMT+ source activity to control for source estimation biases caused by point spread. Taken together, these results suggest that parsing object motion from self-motion-induced optic flow in the human extrastriate visual cortex can be facilitated by crossmodal influences from auditory system.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Crossmodal; Magnetoencephalography; Motion processing; Multisensory; Object motion; Optic flow; Self-motion; Visual

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33882297      PMCID: PMC8206020          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.610


  72 in total

1.  Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A comparison of global motion perception using a multiple-aperture stimulus.

Authors:  Alan L F Lee; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Durk Talsma; Christian N L Olivers; Clayton Hickey; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A distinct anatomical network of cortical areas for analysis of motion in far peripheral vision.

Authors:  S M Palmer; M G P Rosa
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel.

Authors:  P McLeod; J Driver; J Crisp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Interaction of cortical networks mediating object motion detection by moving observers.

Authors:  F J Calabro; L M Vaina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion.

Authors:  F J Calabro; S Soto-Faraco; L M Vaina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A transient auditory signal shifts the perceived offset position of a moving visual object.

Authors:  Sung-En Chien; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-21

10.  Unidirectional monosynaptic connections from auditory areas to the primary visual cortex in the marmoset monkey.

Authors:  Piotr Majka; Marcello G P Rosa; Shi Bai; Jonathan M Chan; Bing-Xing Huo; Natalia Jermakow; Meng K Lin; Yeonsook S Takahashi; Ianina H Wolkowicz; Katrina H Worthy; Ramesh Rajan; David H Reser; Daniel K Wójcik; Hideyuki Okano; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.