Literature DB >> 21239392

Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Gowri Jayaram1, Joseph M Galea, Amy J Bastian, Pablo Celnik.   

Abstract

Human locomotor adaptive learning is thought to involve the cerebellum, but the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this process are not known. While animal research has pointed to depressive modulation of cerebellar outputs, a direct correlation between adaptive learning and cerebellar depression has never been demonstrated. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess excitability changes occurring in the cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1) after individuals learned a new locomotor pattern on a split-belt treadmill. To control for potential changes associated to task performance complexity, the same group of subjects was also assessed after performing 2 other locomotor tasks that did not elicit learning. We found that only adaptive learning resulted in reduction of cerebellar inhibition. This effect was strongly correlated with the magnitude of learning (r = 0.78). In contrast, M1 excitability changes were not specific to learning but rather occurred in association with task complexity performance. Our results demonstrate that locomotor adaptive learning in humans is proportional to cerebellar excitability depression. This finding supports the theory that adaptive learning is mediated, at least in part, by long-term depression in Purkinje cells. This knowledge opens the opportunity to target cerebellar processes with noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239392      PMCID: PMC3202738          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  45 in total

1.  Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum.

Authors:  A D Pinto; R Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effects of lorazepam on short latency afferent inhibition and short latency intracortical inhibition in humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; E Saturno; M Dileone; F Pilato; R Nardone; F Ranieri; G Musumeci; T Fiorilla; P Tonali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Can we see the cerebellar activation effect by TMS over the back of the head?

Authors:  Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Robert Wityk; Kenneth Silver; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Links from complex spikes to local plasticity and motor learning in the cerebellum of awake-behaving monkeys.

Authors:  Javier F Medina; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Corticospinal activation confounds cerebellar effects of posterior fossa stimuli.

Authors:  Karen M Fisher; H Ming Lai; Mark R Baker; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  78 in total

1.  Rapid changes in corticospinal excitability during force field adaptation of human walking.

Authors:  D Barthélemy; S Alain; M J Grey; J B Nielsen; L J Bouyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Split-belt walking: adaptation differences between young and older adults.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Bruijn; Annouchka Van Impe; Jacques Duysens; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Authors:  Alejandro Vazquez; Matthew A Statton; Stefanie A Busgang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Why do patients with cerebellar ataxia not use environmental cues for reducing unpredictability of sudden gait stopping?

Authors:  M Iosa; G Morone; A Fusco; S Paolucci
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Intensity and generalization of treadmill slip training: High or low, progressive increase or decrease?

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Tanvi Bhatt; Yi-Chung Clive Pai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Motor adaptation training for faster relearning.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Erin V L Vasudevan; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Changes in corticospinal excitability following adaptive modification to human walking.

Authors:  J R Zabukovec; L A Boyd; M A Linsdell; T Lam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.