Literature DB >> 26424576

Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Alejandro Vazquez1, Matthew A Statton2, Stefanie A Busgang3, Amy J Bastian4.   

Abstract

Motor learning during reaching not only recalibrates movement but can also lead to small but consistent changes in the sense of arm position. Studies have suggested that this sensory effect may be the result of recalibration of a forward model that associates motor commands with their sensory consequences. Here we investigated whether similar perceptual changes occur in the lower limbs after learning a new walking pattern on a split-belt treadmill--a task that critically involves proprioception. Specifically, we studied how this motor learning task affects perception of leg speed during walking, perception of leg position during standing or walking, and perception of contact force during stepping. Our results show that split-belt adaptation leads to robust motor aftereffects and alters the perception of leg speed during walking. This is specific to the direction of walking that was trained during adaptation (i.e., backward or forward). The change in leg speed perception accounts for roughly half of the observed motor aftereffect. In contrast, split-belt adaptation does not alter the perception of leg position during standing or walking and does not change the perception of stepping force. Our results demonstrate that there is a recalibration of a sensory percept specific to the domain of the perturbation that was applied during walking (i.e., speed but not position or force). Furthermore, the motor and sensory consequences of locomotor adaptation may be linked, suggesting overlapping mechanisms driving changes in the motor and sensory domains.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  adaptation; gait; motor learning; perception; split-belt treadmill

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424576      PMCID: PMC4686284          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00302.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

Review 1.  Neural adaptation in the generation of rhythmic behavior.

Authors:  K G Pearson
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.318

2.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of walking in a force field for varying durations on aftereffects and on next day performance.

Authors:  Karine Fortin; Andreanne Blanchette; Bradford J McFadyen; Laurent J Bouyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Younger is not always better: development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  Erin V L Vasudevan; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Susanne M Morton; Jaynie F Yang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Motor learning and its sensory effects: time course of perceptual change and its presence with gradual introduction of load.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; Mohammad Darainy; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Simple spike discharge patterns of Purkinje cells in the paramedian lobule of the cerebellum during locomotion in the awake cat.

Authors:  R Apps; M Lidierth
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1989-07-31       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Aftereffects from jogging.

Authors:  S Anstis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The cerebellum is not necessary for visually driven recalibration of hand proprioception.

Authors:  Denise Y P Henriques; Filipp Filippopulos; Andreas Straube; Thomas Eggert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior.

Authors:  Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner; Peter Thier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  16 in total

1.  Rapid limb-specific modulation of vestibular contributions to ankle muscle activity during locomotion.

Authors:  Patrick A Forbes; Mark Vlutters; Christopher J Dakin; Herman van der Kooij; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Alfred C Schouten
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Movement and perception recalibrate differently across multiple days of locomotor learning.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Kevin A Day; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Saccular function is associated with both angular and distance errors on the triangle completion test.

Authors:  E R Anson; M R Ehrenburg; E X Wei; D Bakar; E Simonsick; Y Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Sensorimotor recalibration during split-belt walking: task-specific and multisensory?

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Megan K O'Brien
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Erin V L Vasudevan; Rami J Hamzey; Eileen M Kirk
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Two biomechanical strategies for locomotor adaptation to split-belt treadmill walking in subjects with and without transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Megan E Toney; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Taking advantage of external mechanical work to reduce metabolic cost: the mechanics and energetics of split-belt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; J Maxwell Donelan; James M Finley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Making Sense of Cerebellar Contributions to Perceptual and Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Matthew A Statton; Alejandro Vazquez; Susanne M Morton; Erin V L Vasudevan; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.648

10.  Evidence of Energetic Optimization during Adaptation Differs for Metabolic, Mechanical, and Perceptual Estimates of Energetic Cost.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Sungwoo Park; James M Finley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.