Literature DB >> 17039357

Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Joann Kluzik1, Robert J Peterka, Fay B Horak.   

Abstract

We previously showed that standing on an inclined surface resulted in an after-effect of leaning in many healthy, blindfolded subjects when they returned to standing on a horizontal surface (Kluzik et al. in Exp Brain Res 162:474-489, 2005). The direction of leaning depended on the direction of prior surface inclination, always in a direction that preserved the relative alignment between the body and the support surface. For example, subjects leaned forward after they stood on a toes-up-inclined surface. In the present study, we investigated how the amplitude of surface inclination affected postural muscle activity, joint position, body segment orientation, and body center of mass (CoM) and foot center of pressure (CoP) locations before, during, and after subjects stood on an inclined surface. We asked whether the mechanism that underlies the lean after-effect involves regulation of local postural variables, such as the position of the ankle joint or the level of muscle activity, or whether instead, the mechanism involves regulation of global, whole-body postural variables that can only be determined by multisensory processing, such as orientation of the trunk or the body's CoM. In one experiment, we found that varying the amplitude of a toes-up surface inclination between 2.5 degrees and 10 degrees had a systematic, linear, effect on the post-incline orientation of the trunk and head, but did not systematically affect the post-incline orientation of the legs, position of the ankle joint, the level of EMG activity, or the location of the CoP. In a second experiment, we found that preventing the legs from leaning in the post-incline period did not abolish leaning of the upper body. These findings suggest that (1) the body-to-support-surface relationship is an important reference for the CNS internal representation of postural orientation which is subject to adaptive modification and (2) the adaptive mechanism underlying the post-incline after-effect of leaning acts at the level of global, whole-body postural variables.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17039357     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0715-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  53 in total

1.  Forward versus backward walking: transfer of podokinetic adaptation.

Authors:  G M Earhart; G M Jones; F B Horak; E W Block; K D Weber; W A Fletcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Limited control strategies with the loss of vestibular function.

Authors:  Rob Creath; Tim Kiemel; Fay Horak; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions--a conceptual model.

Authors:  T Mergner; T Rosemeier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-11

4.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults.

Authors:  T E Prieto; J B Myklebust; R G Hoffmann; E G Lovett; B M Myklebust
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Representation of multiple kinematic parameters of the cat hindlimb in spinocerebellar activity.

Authors:  G Bosco; R E Poppele
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Aftereffects from jogging.

Authors:  S Anstis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Determinants of postural orientation in quadrupedal stance.

Authors:  J Fung; J M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tilting reactions and disorders of the basal ganglia.

Authors:  J P Martin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Dissociation between the perception of body verticality and the visual vertical in acute peripheral vestibular disorder in humans.

Authors:  D Anastasopoulos; T Haslwanter; A Bronstein; M Fetter; J Dichgans
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans.

Authors:  H O Karnath; S Ferber; J Dichgans
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  17 in total

1.  Postural reorientation does not cause the locomotor after-effect following rotary locomotion.

Authors:  Callum J Osler; Raymond F Reynolds
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Podokinetic stimulation causes shifts in perception of straight ahead.

Authors:  John T Scott; Corey A Lohnes; Fay B Horak; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of vision on adaptive postural responses following standing on an incline.

Authors:  Gammon M Earhart; Josée M Henckens; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of Visual Dependence on Inter-Segmental Coordination during Upright Stance in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Carole A Tucker; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Evaluation of postural sway and impact forces during ingress and egress of scissor lifts at elevations.

Authors:  Christopher S Pan; Sharon S Chiou; Tsui-Ying Kau; Bryan M Wimer; Xiaopeng Ning; Paul Keane
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Short-term effect of neck muscle vibration on postural disturbances in stroke patients.

Authors:  Stéphanie Leplaideur; Emilie Leblong; Karim Jamal; Chloé Rousseau; Annelise Moulinet Raillon; Pauline Coignard; Mireille Damphousse; Isabelle Bonan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Muscular activity of lower limb muscles associated with working on inclined surfaces.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Laurel Kincl; Brian Lowe; Paul Succop; Amit Bhattacharya
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Post-effect of forward and backward locomotion on body orientation in space during quiet stance.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Carlo Zanetti; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.