Literature DB >> 19605648

Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Joseph M Galea1, Gowri Jayaram, Loni Ajagbe, Pablo Celnik.   

Abstract

The cerebellum is a crucial structure involved in movement control and cognitive processing. Noninvasive stimulation of the cerebellum results in neurophysiological and behavioral changes, an effect that has been attributed to modulation of cerebello-brain connectivity. At rest, the cerebellum exerts an overall inhibitory tone over the primary motor cortex (M1), cerebello-brain inhibition (CBI), likely through dentate-thalamo-cortical connections. The level of excitability of this pathway before and after stimulation of the cerebellum, however, has not been directly investigated. In this study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to determine changes in M1, brainstem, and CBI before and after 25 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the right cerebellar cortex. We hypothesized that anodal tDCS would result in an enhancement of CBI and cathodal would decrease it, relative to sham stimulation. We found that cathodal tDCS resulted in a clear decrease of CBI, whereas anodal tDCS increased it, in the absence of changes after sham stimulation. These effects were specific to the cerebello-cortical connections with no changes in other M1 or brainstem excitability measures. The cathodal effect on CBI was found to be dependent on stimulation intensity and lasted up to 30 min after the cessation of tDCS. These results suggest that tDCS can modulate in a focal and polarity-specific manner cerebellar excitability, likely through changes in Purkinje cell activity. Therefore, direct current stimulation of the cerebellum may have significant potential implications for patients with cerebellar dysfunction as well as to motor control studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19605648      PMCID: PMC2760225          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Brigida Fierro; Giuseppe Giglia; Antonio Palermo; Carla Pecoraro; Simona Scalia; Filippo Brighina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory.

Authors:  R Ferrucci; S Marceglia; M Vergari; F Cogiamanian; S Mrakic-Sposta; F Mameli; S Zago; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Modulating cerebello-thalamocortical pathways by neuronavigated cerebellar repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS).

Authors:  B Langguth; P Eichhammer; M Zowe; M Landgrebe; H Binder; P Sand; G Hajak
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.734

5.  Effects of human cerebellar thalamus disruption on adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Haiyin Chen; Sherwin E Hua; Maurice A Smith; Frederick A Lenz; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Francesco Mori; Barbara Marconi; Claudia Codecà; Cristiano Pecchioli; Silvia Salerno; Sara Torriero; Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Pablo Mir; Massimiliano Oliveri; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Focusing effect of acetylcholine on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Jan Grosch; Felipe Fregni; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Orlando B Swayne; Yves Vandermeeren; Mickael Camus; Michael A Dimyan; Michelle Harris-Love; Monica A Perez; Patrick Ragert; John C Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Penelope Talelli; Francesco Mori; Giacomo Koch; Antonio Suppa; Mark Edwards; Henry Houlden; Kailash Bhatia; Richard Greenwood; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Lars O D Christensen; Owen Cain; James Stanley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  176 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cerebellum and processing of negative facial emotions: cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation specifically enhances the emotional recognition of facial anger and sadness.

Authors:  Roberta Ferrucci; Gaia Giannicola; Manuela Rosa; Manuela Fumagalli; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Mark Hallett; Stefano Zago; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-11-14

Review 3.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Defective cerebellar control of cortical plasticity in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Cecile Hubsch; Emmanuel Roze; Traian Popa; Margherita Russo; Ammu Balachandran; Salini Pradeep; Florian Mueller; Vanessa Brochard; Angelo Quartarone; Bertrand Degos; Marie Vidailhet; Asha Kishore; Sabine Meunier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Roberta Ferrucci; Andre R Brunoni; Marta Parazzini; Maurizio Vergari; Elena Rossi; Manuela Fumagalli; Francesca Mameli; Manuela Rosa; Gaia Giannicola; Stefano Zago; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Damien Pastor; Adrian M Haith; Yves Rossetti; Reza Shadmehr; Jacinta O'Shea
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.