Literature DB >> 11685404

Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum.

A D Pinto1, R Chen.   

Abstract

Conditioning magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum suppresses the motor cortex 5-8 ms later, probably through activation of cerebellar Purkinje cells, which inhibit the dentatothalamocortical pathway. To further characterize this pathway, we examined several factors that may modulate its excitability. We tested the effects of different test motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes, voluntary activation of the target muscle, and arm extension that required activation of proximal arm muscles while maintaining relaxation of hand muscles. Surface electromyography was recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. A double-cone coil centered 3 cm lateral to the inion was used for right cerebellar stimulation. The stimulus intensity was set at 5% below the threshold for activation of the corticospinal tract. A figure-of-eight coil was used for left motor cortex stimulation. Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between 3 and 15 ms were studied. Small test MEPs of about 0.5 mV were markedly inhibited at ISIs of 5-8 ms, but there was much less inhibition for test MEPs of about 2 mV. There was no significant MEP suppression during voluntary activation of the FDI muscle or during right arm extension. Left arm extension did not affect inhibition. Our findings indicate that cerebellar stimulation has a much stronger effect on motor cortex neurons activated near threshold intensities than those activated at higher intensities. Activation of contralateral but not ipsilateral proximal arm muscles during arm extension reduced the excitability of the cerebellothalamocortical projections to the hand area of the motor cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11685404     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Facilitatory effect on the motor cortex by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in humans.

Authors:  Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ritsuko Hanajima; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Yasuo Terao; Haruo Uesugi; Yasushi Shiio; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Ichiro Kanazawa; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Cerebellar brain inhibition in the target and surround muscles during voluntary tonic activation.

Authors:  Pattamon Panyakaew; Hyun Joo Cho; Prachaya Srivanitchapoom; Traian Popa; Tianxia Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Hannah J Block; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Treatment and physiology in Parkinson's disease and dystonia: using transcranial magnetic stimulation to uncover the mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Aparna Wagle Shukla; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.