Literature DB >> 29758954

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Trisha M Kesar1, James W Stinear2, Steven L Wolf1,3.   

Abstract

Neuroplasticity is a fundamental yet relatively unexplored process that can impact rehabilitation of lower extremity (LE) movements. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained widespread application as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for evaluating neuroplasticity of the corticospinal pathway. However, a majority of TMS studies have been performed on hand muscles, with a paucity of TMS investigations focused on LE muscles. This perspective review paper proposes that there are unique methodological challenges associated with using TMS to evaluate corticospinal excitability of lower limb muscles. The challenges include: (1) the deeper location of the LE motor homunculus; (2) difficulty with targeting individual LE muscles during TMS; and (3) differences in corticospinal circuity controlling upper and lower limb muscles. We encourage future investigations that modify traditional methodological approaches to help address these challenges. Systematic TMS investigations are needed to determine the extent of overlap in corticomotor maps for different LE muscles. A simple, yet informative methodological solution involves simultaneous recordings from multiple LE muscles, which will provide the added benefit of observing how other relevant muscles co-vary in their responses during targeted TMS assessment directed toward a specific muscle. Furthermore, conventionally used TMS methods (e.g., determination of hot spot location and motor threshold) may need to be modified for TMS studies involving LE muscles. Additional investigations are necessary to determine the influence of testing posture as well as activation state of adjacent and distant LE muscles on TMS-elicited responses. An understanding of these challenges and solutions specific to LE TMS will improve the ability of neurorehabilitation clinicians to interpret TMS literature, and forge novel future directions for neuroscience research focused on elucidating neuroplasticity processes underlying locomotion and gait training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuroplasticity; gait; homunculus; leg muscles; motor cortex; non-invasive brain stimulation; posture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29758954      PMCID: PMC6106786          DOI: 10.3233/RNN-170801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  122 in total

1.  Postural challenge affects motor cortical activity in young and old adults.

Authors:  Selma Papegaaij; Wolfgang Taube; Helco G van Keeken; Egbert Otten; Stéphane Baudry; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Symmetric corticospinal excitability and representation of vastus lateralis muscle in right-handed healthy subjects.

Authors:  Mohomad Al Sawah; Mohammad Rimawi; Carmen Concerto; Bahaa Amer; Yisheng Cao; Anthony V D'Antoni; Eileen Chusid; Fortunato Battaglia
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Postural dependence of human locomotion during gait initiation.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Mille; Martin Simoneau; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cortical motor representation of the rectus femoris does not differ between the left and right hemisphere.

Authors:  Sarah Ward; Adam L Bryant; Brian Pietrosimone; Kim L Bennell; Ross Clark; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Cortical contributions to anticipatory postural adjustments in the trunk.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chiou; Madeleine Hurry; Thomas Reed; Jing Xiao Quek; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Reciprocal Ia inhibition between ankle flexors and extensors in man.

Authors:  C Crone; H Hultborn; B Jespersen; J Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods.

Authors:  D F Sobel; C C Gallen; B J Schwartz; T A Waltz; B Copeland; S Yamada; E C Hirschkoff; F E Bloom
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Projections of pyramidal tract cells to alpha-motoneurones innervating hind-limb muscles in the monkey.

Authors:  E Jankowska; Y Padel; R Tanaka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Shannon Kahn; Steven L Wolf; Paul Weiss
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  22 in total

1.  Characterizing off-target corticospinal responses to double-cone transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F Proessl; M C Canino; M E Beckner; A M Sinnott; S R Eagle; A D LaGoy; W R Conkright; A J Sterczala; C Connaboy; F Ferrarelli; A Germain; B C Nindl; S D Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Jing Nong Liang; Steve A Kautz; Mark S George; Mark G Bowden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Planning face, hand, and leg movements: anatomical constraints on preparatory inhibition.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Claudia Tischler; Christian Cazares; Ian Greenhouse; Julie Duque; Florent Lebon; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effect of conventional transcranial direct current stimulation devices and electrode sizes on motor cortical excitability of the quadriceps muscle.

Authors:  Adam Z Gardi; Amanda K Vogel; Aastha K Dharia; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 5.  TMS-induced silent periods: A review of methods and call for consistency.

Authors:  K E Hupfeld; C W Swanson; B W Fling; R D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Reliability of transcallosal inhibition measurements for the lower limb motor cortex in stroke.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with aerobic exercise to optimize cortical priming in stroke.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.665

8.  Motor Cortical Network Flexibility is Associated With Biomechanical Walking Impairment in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Trisha M Kesar; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Distinct patterns of spasticity and corticospinal connectivity following complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Steven Kirshblum; James D Guest; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.228

10.  Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke.

Authors:  John Harvey Kindred; Christian Finetto; Jasmine Jamilah Cash; Mark Goodman Bowden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.