Literature DB >> 29730789

The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Lara Fernandez1, Brendan P Major2, Wei-Peng Teo3, Linda K Byrne2, Peter G Enticott2.   

Abstract

Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) describes the inhibitory tone the cerebellum exerts on the primary motor cortex (M1). CBI can be indexed via a dual-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, whereby a conditioning stimulus (CS) is delivered to the cerebellum in advance of a test stimulus (TS) to M1. The CS is typically delivered at intensities over 60% maximum stimulus output (MSO) via a double-cone coil. This is reportedly uncomfortable for participants, reducing the reliability and validity of outcomes. This feasibility study investigates the reliability and tolerability of eliciting CBI across a range of CS intensities using both a double-cone and high-powered figure-of-8 coil, the D702. It was expected that the double-cone coil would elicit CBI at intensities upwards of 60%MSO. The range for the D702 coil was exploratory. The double-cone coil was expected to be less tolerable than the D702 coil. CBI was assessed in 13 participants (25.92 ± 5.42 years, six female) using each coil (randomized) over intensities 40, 50, 60, 70, 80%MSO. Tolerability was assessed via visual analog scales. Comparisons across intensities and tolerability were assessed non-parametrically and via a linear model. The double-cone coil elicited CBI at intensities 60, 70, and 80%MSO (p < .05), with suppression elicited at 60%MSO not significantly different to that at higher intensities. CBI was not reliably elicited by the D702 coil at any intensity. The double-cone coil was significantly less tolerable than the D702. A CS of 60%MSO with a double-cone coil provides a balance between the reliability and tolerability of CBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellar brain inhibition; Cerebellum; D702 coil; Double-cone coil; M1; Tolerability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730789     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-018-0942-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  44 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract.

Authors:  J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04

2.  A novel protocol to investigate motor training-induced plasticity and sensorimotor integration in the cerebellum and motor cortex.

Authors:  Julianne Baarbé; Paul Yielder; Julian Daligadu; Hushyar Behbahani; Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cerebellar input to corticothalamic neurons in layers V and VI in the motor cortex.

Authors:  J Na; S Kakei; Y Shinoda
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Hannah J Block; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effect of stimulus parameters on TMS-EEG muscle artifacts.

Authors:  Tuomas Mutanen; Hanna Mäki; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction, and functional roles.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Cerebellar brain inhibition is decreased in active and surround muscles at the onset of voluntary movement.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kassavetis; Britt S Hoffland; Tabish A Saifee; Kailash P Bhatia; Bart P van de Warrenburg; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dynamic modulation of cerebellar excitability for abrupt, but not gradual, visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  John E Schlerf; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  13 in total

1.  Both 50 and 30 Hz continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation depresses the cerebellum.

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Aaron D Chau; Liu Shi Gan; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Motor cortex plasticity and visuomotor skill learning in upper and lower limbs of endurance-trained cyclists.

Authors:  Brodie J Hand; George M Opie; Simranjit K Sidhu; John G Semmler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  The Effect of Cerebellar rTMS on Modulating Motor Dysfunction in Neurological Disorders: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yifei Xia; Mingqi Wang; Yulian Zhu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.648

4.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.

Authors:  Wei-Yeh Liao; Ryoki Sasaki; John G Semmler; George M Opie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Charlotte Rosso; Eric Jr Moulton; Claire Kemlin; Sara Leder; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Sophien Mehdi; Mickael A Obadia; Mickael Obadia; Marion Yger; Elena Meseguer; Vincent Perlbarg; Romain Valabregue; Serena Magno; Pavel Lindberg; Sabine Meunier; Jean-Charles Lamy
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.088

Review 6.  New Horizons on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Social and Affective Cerebellum.

Authors:  Z Cattaneo; C Ferrari; A Ciricugno; E Heleven; D J L G Schutter; M Manto; F Van Overwalle
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Reduced Cerebellar Brain Inhibition Measured Using Dual-Site TMS in Older Than in Younger Adults.

Authors:  B K Rurak; J P Rodrigues; B D Power; P D Drummond; A M Vallence
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Interactions Between Cerebellum and the Intracortical Excitatory Circuits of Motor Cortex: a Mini-Review.

Authors:  George M Opie; Wei-Yeh Liao; John G Semmler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  Multimodal treatment for spinal cord injury: a sword of neuroregeneration upon neuromodulation.

Authors:  Ya Zheng; Ye-Ran Mao; Ti-Fei Yuan; Dong-Sheng Xu; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Characterising the influence of cerebellum on the neuroplastic modulation of intracortical motor circuits.

Authors:  George M Opie; John G Semmler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.