Qinan Bao1, Arion F Chatziioannou. 1. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, The Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 570 Westwood Plaza, Bldg. 114, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. qbao@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The traditional figures of merit used in the evaluation of positron emission tomography (PET) systems, including system sensitivity and spatial resolution, do not directly reflect the minimum detectable activity (MDA) performance, despite the fact that it is one of the most important tasks for a PET system. MDA, as a combination of the more traditional PET system parameters, is directly related to lesion detection. However, MDA evaluation is task specific and cannot be done by a single measurement. Therefore, a simple method to evaluate system detectability needs to be developed. METHODS: In this work, an analytical method of MDA estimation was developed, taking into account system sensitivity, spatial resolution, source properties, and noise propagation in image reconstruction by using the Rose criterion and/or the Curie equation as the detection standard. In the implementation, the source background, as well as the intrinsic activity background from the scintillation material of the system, was also taken into consideration. The accuracy of this method was evaluated in two commercially available preclinical PET systems, with phantom experiments that were designed to closely mimic in vivo tumor uptake without introducing finite boundaries between the source and the background. RESULTS: The lesion contrast-to-noise ratio calculated by the analytical evaluation showed good agreement with that obtained from the experiments. Visual assessment of the reconstructed images at the detection limit (based on analytical evaluation) also was in agreement with the Rose criterion. The MDA performance was quantitatively compared between the two preclinical PET systems and showed different detection limits under different imaging conditions, suggesting that the detection limit of a PET system strongly depends on the lesion properties and acquisition settings. CONCLUSIONS: An analytical method of evaluating the PET system detectability was developed and validated by experiments. Overall, the analytical MDA calculation provides a simple way to evaluate the signal detectability of a PET system and can be used for comparing different systems. It also provides guidelines for designing new PET tomographs as well as optimizing data acquisition protocols.
PURPOSE: The traditional figures of merit used in the evaluation of positron emission tomography (PET) systems, including system sensitivity and spatial resolution, do not directly reflect the minimum detectable activity (MDA) performance, despite the fact that it is one of the most important tasks for a PET system. MDA, as a combination of the more traditional PET system parameters, is directly related to lesion detection. However, MDA evaluation is task specific and cannot be done by a single measurement. Therefore, a simple method to evaluate system detectability needs to be developed. METHODS: In this work, an analytical method of MDA estimation was developed, taking into account system sensitivity, spatial resolution, source properties, and noise propagation in image reconstruction by using the Rose criterion and/or the Curie equation as the detection standard. In the implementation, the source background, as well as the intrinsic activity background from the scintillation material of the system, was also taken into consideration. The accuracy of this method was evaluated in two commercially available preclinical PET systems, with phantom experiments that were designed to closely mimic in vivo tumor uptake without introducing finite boundaries between the source and the background. RESULTS: The lesion contrast-to-noise ratio calculated by the analytical evaluation showed good agreement with that obtained from the experiments. Visual assessment of the reconstructed images at the detection limit (based on analytical evaluation) also was in agreement with the Rose criterion. The MDA performance was quantitatively compared between the two preclinical PET systems and showed different detection limits under different imaging conditions, suggesting that the detection limit of a PET system strongly depends on the lesion properties and acquisition settings. CONCLUSIONS: An analytical method of evaluating the PET system detectability was developed and validated by experiments. Overall, the analytical MDA calculation provides a simple way to evaluate the signal detectability of a PET system and can be used for comparing different systems. It also provides guidelines for designing new PET tomographs as well as optimizing data acquisition protocols.
Authors: Charles C Watson; Michael E Casey; Lars Eriksson; Tim Mulnix; Doug Adams; Bernard Bendriem Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marisa Bazañez-Borgert; Ralph A Bundschuh; Michael Herz; Maria-Jose Martínez; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle I Ziegler Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Claudio R Scafoglio; Brendon Villegas; Gihad Abdelhady; Sean T Bailey; Jie Liu; Aditya S Shirali; W Dean Wallace; Clara E Magyar; Tristan R Grogan; David Elashoff; Tonya Walser; Jane Yanagawa; Denise R Aberle; Jorge R Barrio; Steven M Dubinett; David B Shackelford Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ken Herrmann; Magnus Dahlbom; David Nathanson; Liu Wei; Caius Radu; Arion Chatziioannou; Johannes Czernin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Z Gu; R Taschereau; N T Vu; H Wang; D L Prout; R W Silverman; B Bai; D B Stout; M E Phelps; A F Chatziioannou Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 3.609