UNLABELLED: The Genisys4 is a small bench-top preclinical PET scanner designed to enable imaging in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and imaging centers. Here, we compare its performance with that of a well-established preclinical PET scanner. METHODS: Subcutaneous and lung tumor xenografts were used to compare lesion detectability and treatment responses to chemotherapy (gemcitabine) using (18)F-FDG PET. The size of subcutaneous xenografts (L1210 and L1210-10K leukemia cells) and lung metastases (B-16 melanoma cells) was measured on small-animal CT images. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake was expressed as percentage injected dose per gram. Using list-mode data, serial images of the left ventricular blood pool were used to generate time-activity curves. RESULTS: Subcutaneous xenografts (range, 4-12 mm; mean ± SD, 6.1 ± 1.7 mm) and lung metastases (range, 1-5 mm; mean, 2.1 ± 1.2 mm) were detected equally well with both scanners. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake measured with both scanners was highly correlated for subcutaneous xenografts (r(2) = 0.93) and lung metastases (r(2) = 0.83). The new Genisys4 scanner and the established scanner provided comparable treatment response information (r(2) = 0.93). Dynamic imaging sequences permitted the generation of left ventricular blood-pool time-activity curves with both scanners. CONCLUSION: Using subcutaneous and lung xenografts, a novel and an established preclinical PET scanner provided equivalent information with regard to lesion detection, tumor (18)F-FDG uptake, tumor response to treatment, and generation of time-activity curves. Thus, the Genisys4 provides a small, efficient bench-top preclinical PET alternative for quantitatively studying murine tumor models in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and preclinical imaging centers.
UNLABELLED: The Genisys4 is a small bench-top preclinical PET scanner designed to enable imaging in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and imaging centers. Here, we compare its performance with that of a well-established preclinical PET scanner. METHODS: Subcutaneous and lung tumor xenografts were used to compare lesion detectability and treatment responses to chemotherapy (gemcitabine) using (18)F-FDG PET. The size of subcutaneous xenografts (L1210 and L1210-10K leukemia cells) and lung metastases (B-16melanoma cells) was measured on small-animal CT images. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake was expressed as percentage injected dose per gram. Using list-mode data, serial images of the left ventricular blood pool were used to generate time-activity curves. RESULTS: Subcutaneous xenografts (range, 4-12 mm; mean ± SD, 6.1 ± 1.7 mm) and lung metastases (range, 1-5 mm; mean, 2.1 ± 1.2 mm) were detected equally well with both scanners. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake measured with both scanners was highly correlated for subcutaneous xenografts (r(2) = 0.93) and lung metastases (r(2) = 0.83). The new Genisys4 scanner and the established scanner provided comparable treatment response information (r(2) = 0.93). Dynamic imaging sequences permitted the generation of left ventricular blood-pool time-activity curves with both scanners. CONCLUSION: Using subcutaneous and lung xenografts, a novel and an established preclinical PET scanner provided equivalent information with regard to lesion detection, tumor (18)F-FDG uptake, tumor response to treatment, and generation of time-activity curves. Thus, the Genisys4 provides a small, efficient bench-top preclinical PET alternative for quantitatively studying murinetumor models in biology, biochemistry, and pharmacology laboratories and preclinical imaging centers.
Authors: Zhao Chen; Katherine Cheng; Zandra Walton; Yuchuan Wang; Hiromichi Ebi; Takeshi Shimamura; Yan Liu; Tanya Tupper; Jing Ouyang; Jie Li; Peng Gao; Michele S Woo; Chunxiao Xu; Masahiko Yanagita; Abigail Altabef; Shumei Wang; Charles Lee; Yuji Nakada; Christopher G Peña; Yanping Sun; Yoko Franchetti; Catherine Yao; Amy Saur; Michael D Cameron; Mizuki Nishino; D Neil Hayes; Matthew D Wilkerson; Patrick J Roberts; Carrie B Lee; Nabeel Bardeesy; Mohit Butaney; Lucian R Chirieac; Daniel B Costa; David Jackman; Norman E Sharpless; Diego H Castrillon; George D Demetri; Pasi A Jänne; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Lewis C Cantley; Andrew L Kung; Jeffrey A Engelman; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Nature Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mark Muzi; Alexander M Spence; Finbarr O'Sullivan; David A Mankoff; Joanne M Wells; John R Grierson; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jonathan B Hurov; Mei Huang; Lynn S White; Jochen Lennerz; Cheol Soo Choi; You-Ree Cho; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Julie L Prior; David Piwnica-Worms; Lewis C Cantley; Jason K Kim; Gerald I Shulman; Helen Piwnica-Worms Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P M Bloomfield; S Rajeswaran; T J Spinks; S P Hume; R Myers; S Ashworth; K M Clifford; W F Jones; L G Byars; J Young Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Barbara J Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Isabel Hildebrandt; Chris Tran; Benjamin S Halpern; David Stout; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Brian P Lieberman; Karl Ploessl; Limin Wang; Wenchao Qu; Zhihao Zha; David R Wise; Lewis A Chodosh; George Belka; Craig B Thompson; Hank F Kung Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Martin A Walter; Matthias R Benz; Isabel J Hildebrandt; Rachel E Laing; Verena Hartung; Robert D Damoiseaux; Andreas Bockisch; Michael E Phelps; Johannes Czernin; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wolfgang P Fendler; Andreea D Stuparu; Susan Evans-Axelsson; Katharina Lückerath; Liu Wei; Woosuk Kim; Soumya Poddar; Jonathan Said; Caius G Radu; Matthias Eiber; Johannes Czernin; Roger Slavik; Ken Herrmann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Zheng Gu; Richard Taschereau; Nam T Vu; David L Prout; Robert W Silverman; Jason T Lee; Arion F Chatziioannou Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Katharina Lückerath; Andreea D Stuparu; Liu Wei; Woosuk Kim; Caius G Radu; Christine E Mona; Jeremie Calais; Matthew Rettig; Robert E Reiter; Johannes Czernin; Roger Slavik; Ken Herrmann; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Cristina Müller; Christiaan Vermeulen; Karl Johnston; Ulli Köster; Raffaella Schmid; Andreas Türler; Nicholas P van der Meulen Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2016-04-23 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Christian Vanhove; Jens P Bankstahl; Stefanie D Krämer; Eric Visser; Nicola Belcari; Stefaan Vandenberghe Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2015-11-11
Authors: Katharina Lückerath; Liu Wei; Wolfgang P Fendler; Susan Evans-Axelsson; Andreea D Stuparu; Roger Slavik; Christine E Mona; Jeremie Calais; Matthew Rettig; Robert E Reiter; Ken Herrmann; Caius G Radu; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.138