Literature DB >> 34749660

A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.

Shujie Lu1, Peng Zhang1, Chengwei Li1, Jie Sun1, Wenli Liu1, Pu Zhang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The commonly used NEMA IEC Body phantom has a number of defects, hindering its application for detecting micro-lesions and measuring the performance parameters of computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to propose a PET/CT phantom designed by National Institute of Metrology (NIM), China, which is capable of simultaneously testing the performance of PET and CT systems, and to evaluate the quality of imaging.
METHODS: The phantom developed in the present study, the NIM PET/CT phantom, is composed of a PET imaging module and a CT imaging module, and these modules are connected together through bolts, which can simultaneously measure the imaging performance of PET and CT systems. Hot spheres were filled with 4:1 sphere-to-background activity concentration using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), and cold spheres were filled with non-radioactive water. We compared the results of imaging obtained from the NIM PET/CT phantom and the NEMA IEC Body phantom to assess their diagnostic efficacy. In order to evaluate the generalization ability of the NIM PET/CT phantom, three different PET/CT systems were used to scan on the same scanning protocol. To evaluate the effects of image reconstruction algorithms on image quality assessment, ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM-point-spread function (PSF), OSEM-TOF, and OSEM-PSF-TOF algorithms were employed.
RESULTS: The imaging quality of the NIM PET/CT phantom and the NEMA IEC Body phantom was relatively consistent. The NIM PET/CT phantom could detect 7 mm spheres without influencing the imaging quality. It was found that PSF reconstruction exhibited to reduce the speed of convergence, the contrast and background variability of spheres (13-28 mm) were significantly improved after two iterations. In addition to improve the image contrast and background variability, TOF could markedly improve the overall image quality and instrument detection limit. TOF-PSF could noticeably reduce noise level, enhance imaging details, and improve quality of imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that in comparison with the NEMA IEC Body phantom, the NIM PET/CT phantom outperformed in evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT performance parameters; Image quality; Micro-lesions; PET/CT phantom

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34749660      PMCID: PMC8576981          DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00683-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Imaging        ISSN: 1471-2342            Impact factor:   1.930


  24 in total

1.  NEMA NU 2-2001 performance testing of a Philips Gemini GXL PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Chithradevi Sathiakumar; Seu Som; Stefan Eberl; Peter Lin
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.430

2.  Estimation of the minimum detectable activity of preclinical PET imaging systems with an analytical method.

Authors:  Qinan Bao; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Oncological applications of FDG PET imaging: brain tumors, colorectal cancer, lymphoma and melanoma.

Authors:  D Delbeke
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Suleman Surti; Cathryn M Trott; Joshua Scheuermann; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  PET/CT fusion scan enhances CT staging in patients with pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Farma; Alfredo A Santillan; Marcovalerio Melis; Janet Walters; Daly Belinc; Dung-Tsa Chen; Edward A Eikman; Mokenge Malafa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.

Authors:  Takafumi Taniguchi; Go Akamatsu; Yukiko Kasahara; Katsuhiko Mitsumoto; Shingo Baba; Yuji Tsutsui; Kazuhiko Himuro; Shohei Mikasa; Daisuke Kidera; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.668

8.  Minimum lesion detectability as a measure of PET system performance.

Authors:  Stephen Adler; Jurgen Seidel; Peter Choyke; Michael V Knopp; Katherine Binzel; Jun Zhang; Craig Barker; Shielah Conant; Roberto Maass-Moreno
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-03-04

9.  NEMA image quality phantom measurements and attenuation correction in integrated PET/MR hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Susanne Ziegler; Bjoern W Jakoby; Harald Braun; Daniel H Paulus; Harald H Quick
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2015-08-20

10.  Image quality and detectability in Siemens Biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems-a phantom study.

Authors:  Silje Kjærnes Øen; Lars Birger Aasheim; Live Eikenes; Anna Maria Karlberg
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2019-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.