Literature DB >> 21158302

Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model.

Ann-Katherine Carton1, Christer Ullberg, Karin Lindman, Raymond Acciavatti, Tom Francke, Andrew D A Maidment.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dual-energy (DE) iodine contrast-enhanced x-ray imaging of the breast has been shown to identify cancers that would otherwise be mammographically occult. In this article, theoretical modeling was performed to obtain optimally enhanced iodine images for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) system using a DE acquisition technique.
METHODS: In the system examined, the breast is scanned with a multislit prepatient collimator aligned with a multidetector camera. Each detector collects a projection image at a unique angle during the scan. Low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) projection images are acquired simultaneously in a single scan by covering alternate collimator slits with Sn and Cu filters, respectively. Sn filters ranging from 0.08 to 0.22 mm thickness and Cu filters from 0.11 to 0.27 mm thickness were investigated. A tube voltage of 49 kV was selected. Tomographic images, hereafter referred to as DBT images, were reconstructed using a shift-and-add algorithm. Iodine-enhanced DBT images were acquired by performing a weighted logarithmic subtraction of the HE and LE DBT images, The DE technique was evaluated for 20-80 mm thick breasts. Weighting factors, w(t) that optimally cancel breast tissue were computed. Signal-difference-to-noise ratios (SDNRs) between iodine-enhanced and nonenhanced breast tissue normalized to the square root of the mean glandular dose (MGD) were computed as a function of the fraction of the MGD allocated to the HE images. Peak SDNR/ mean square root of MGD and optimal dose allocations were identified. SDNR/ mean square root of MGD and dose allocations were computed for several practical feasible system configurations (i.e., determined by the number of collimator slits covered by Sn and Cu). A practicalsystem configuration an d Sn-Cu filterpair that accounts for the trade-off between SDNR, tube-output, and MGD were selected.
RESULTS: w(t) depends on the Sn-Cu filter combination used, as well as on the breast thickness; to optimally cancel 0% with 50% glandular breast tissue, w(t) values were found to range from 0.46 to 0.72 for all breast thicknesses and Sn-Cu filter pairs studied. The optimal w(t) values needed to cancel all possible breast tissue glandularites vary by less than 1% for 20 mm thick breasts and 18% for 80 mm breasts. The system configuration where one collimator slit covered by Sn is alternated with two collimator slits covered by Cu delivers SDNR/ mean square root of MGD nearest to the peak value. A reasonable compromise is a 0.16 mm Sn-0.23 mm Cu filter pair, resulting in SDNR values between 1.64 and 0.61 and MGD between 0.70 and 0.53 mGy for 20-80 mm thick breasts at the maximum tube current.
CONCLUSIONS: A DE acquisition technique for a photon-counting DBT imaging system has been developed and optimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21158302      PMCID: PMC3188980          DOI: 10.1118/1.3490556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Development of contrast digital mammography.

Authors:  Mia Skarpathiotakis; Martin J Yaffe; Aili K Bloomquist; Dan Rico; Serge Muller; Andreas Rick; Fanny Jeunehomme
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study.

Authors:  A-K Carton; S C Gavenonis; J A Currivan; E F Conant; M D Schnall; A D A Maidment
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.

Authors:  G R Hammerstein; D W Miller; D R White; M E Masterson; H Q Woodard; J S Laughlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner.

Authors:  C H Chang; D E Nesbit; D R Fisher; S L Fritz; S J Dwyer; A W Templeton; F Lin; W R Jewell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Roberta A Jong; Martin J Yaffe; Mia Skarpathiotakis; Rene S Shumak; Nathalie M Danjoux; Anoma Gunesekara; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Pamela K Isaacs; Virginia Vance; Fred J Larke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography--initial experience.

Authors:  F Diekmann; S Diekmann; M Taupitz; U Bick; K-J Winzer; C Hüttner; S Muller; F Jeunehomme; B Hamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas Knogler; Peter Homolka; Mathias Hörnig; Robert Leithner; Georg Langs; Martin Waitzbauer; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Sabine Leitner; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Investigation of x-ray spectra for iodinated contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick; Andrey Makeev
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-26

3.  Model and reconstruction of a K-edge contrast agent distribution with an X-ray photon-counting detector.

Authors:  Bo Meng; Wenxiang Cong; Yan Xi; Bruno De Man; Jian Yang; Ge Wang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  An all-in-one nanoparticle (AION) contrast agent for breast cancer screening with DEM-CT-MRI-NIRF imaging.

Authors:  Jessica C Hsu; Pratap C Naha; Kristen C Lau; Peter Chhour; Renee Hastings; Brianna F Moon; Joel M Stein; Walter R T Witschey; Elizabeth S McDonald; Andrew D A Maidment; David P Cormode
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 7.790

6.  Exploring silver as a contrast agent for contrast-enhanced dual-energy X-ray breast imaging.

Authors:  R Karunamuni; A Tsourkas; A D A Maidment
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Raymond J Acciavatti; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: II. An experimental validation.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Christer Ullberg; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Phantom-based study exploring the effects of different scatter correction approaches on the reconstructed images generated by contrast-enhanced stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Connor Puett; Christina Inscoe; Yueh Z Lee; Otto Zhou; Jianping Lu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-01

10.  Feasibility study of dual energy radiographic imaging for target localization in radiotherapy for lung tumors.

Authors:  Jie Huo; Xianfeng Zhu; Yang Dong; Zhiyong Yuan; Ping Wang; Xuemin Wang; Gang Wang; Xin-Hua Hu; Yuanming Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.