Literature DB >> 29430472

Phantom-based study exploring the effects of different scatter correction approaches on the reconstructed images generated by contrast-enhanced stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Connor Puett1, Christina Inscoe2, Yueh Z Lee1,2,3, Otto Zhou1,2, Jianping Lu2.   

Abstract

Stationary digital breast tomosynthesis (sDBT) is an emerging technology in which the single rotating x-ray tube is replaced by a fixed array of multiple carbon nanotube-enabled sources, providing a higher spatial and temporal resolution. As such, sDBT offers a promising platform for contrast-enhanced (CE) imaging. However, given the minimal enhancement above background with standard operational tube settings and iodine dosing, CE breast imaging requires additional acquisition steps to isolate the iodine signal, using either temporal or dual energy subtraction (TS or DES) protocols. Also, correcting for factors that limit contrast is critical, and scatter and noise pose unique challenges during tomosynthesis. This phantom-based study of CE sDBT compared different postacquisition scatter correction approaches on the quality of the reconstructed image slices. Beam-pass collimation was used to sample scatter indirectly, from which an interpolated scatter map was obtained for each projection image. Scatter-corrected projections provided the information for reconstruction. Comparison between the application of different scatter maps demonstrated the significant effect that processing has on the contrast-to-noise ratio and feature detectability ([Formula: see text]) in the final displayed images and emphasized the critical importance of scatter correction during DES.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast-enhanced; dual-energy subtraction; scatter correction; stationary digital breast tomosynthesis; temporal subtraction

Year:  2018        PMID: 29430472      PMCID: PMC5793963          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.013502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  23 in total

1.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  X-ray scatter correction method for dedicated breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Estimating scatter from sparsely measured primary signal.

Authors:  Gongting Wu; Christina R Inscoe; Jabari Calliste; Jing Shan; Yueh Z Lee; Otto Zhou; Jianping Lu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-29

4.  Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty; Melissa A Durand; Emily F Conant; Debra Somers Copit; Sarah M Friedewald; Donna M Plecha; Dave P Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Christer Ullberg; Karin Lindman; Raymond Acciavatti; Tom Francke; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  An update on carbon nanotube-enabled X-ray sources for biomedical imaging.

Authors:  Connor Puett; Christina Inscoe; Allison Hartman; Jabari Calliste; Dora K Franceschi; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-04-11

7.  Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dragana Roganovic; Dragana Djilas; Sasa Vujnovic; Dag Pavic; Dragan Stojanov
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 8.  Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications.

Authors:  Wendy DeMartini; Constance Lehman; Savannah Partridge
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Roberta A Jong; Martin J Yaffe; Mia Skarpathiotakis; Rene S Shumak; Nathalie M Danjoux; Anoma Gunesekara; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Carl J D'Orsi; Mary S Newell; Rebecca L Seidel; Bhavika Patel; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visualizing microcalcifications in lumpectomy specimens: an exploration into the clinical potential of carbon nanotube-enabled stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Connor Puett; Jenny Gao; Andrew Tucker; Christina R Inscoe; Michael Hwang; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-07-25

2.  Variation in digital breast tomosynthesis image quality at differing heights above the detector.

Authors:  Rob Davidson; Khaled Al Khalifah; Abel Zhou
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-12-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.