Literature DB >> 19505964

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study.

A-K Carton1, S C Gavenonis, J A Currivan, E F Conant, M D Schnall, A D A Maidment.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) is a novel modality for imaging breast lesion morphology and vascularity. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of dual-energy subtraction as a technique for CE-DBT (a temporal subtraction CE-DBT technique has been described previously). As CE-DBT evolves, exploration of alternative image acquisition techniques will contribute to its optimisation. Evaluation of dual-energy CE-DBT was conducted with Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from our institution and in compliance with federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) guidelines. A 55-year old patient with a known malignancy in the right breast underwent imaging with MRI and CE-DBT. CE-DBT was performed in the medial lateral oblique view with a DBT system, which was modified under IRB approval to allow high-energy image acquisition with a 0.25 mm Cu filter. Image acquisition occurred via both temporal and dual-energy subtraction CE-DBT. Between the pre- and post-contrast DBT image sets, a single bolus of iodinated contrast agent (1.0 ml kg(-1)) was administered, followed by a 60 ml saline flush. The contrast agent and saline were administrated manually at a rate of approximately 2 ml s(-1). Images were reconstructed using filtered-back projection and transmitted to a clinical PACS workstation. Dual-energy CE-DBT was shown to be clinically feasible. In our index case, the dual-energy technique was able to provide morphology and kinetic information about the known malignancy. This information was qualitatively concordant with that of CE-MRI. Compared with the temporal subtraction CE-DBT technique, dual-energy CE-DBT appears less susceptible to motion artefacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19505964      PMCID: PMC3473453          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/80279516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Quantitative evaluation of noise reduction strategies in dual-energy imaging.

Authors:  Richard J Warp; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Development of contrast digital mammography.

Authors:  Mia Skarpathiotakis; Martin J Yaffe; Aili K Bloomquist; Dan Rico; Serge Muller; Andreas Rick; Fanny Jeunehomme
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara C Chen; Ann-Katherine Carton; Michael Albert; Emily F Conant; Mitchell D Schnall; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images.

Authors:  W A Kalender; E Klotz; L Kostaridou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  N M Hylton
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  20 in total

1.  The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  Christina M Shafer; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis : technical principles, current clinical relevance and future perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas Knogler; Peter Homolka; Mathias Hörnig; Robert Leithner; Georg Langs; Martin Waitzbauer; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Sabine Leitner; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Advances in mammographic imaging.

Authors:  K J Robson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Subtle signs, subtle designs: future change and BJR.

Authors:  D A Bradley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  An all-in-one nanoparticle (AION) contrast agent for breast cancer screening with DEM-CT-MRI-NIRF imaging.

Authors:  Jessica C Hsu; Pratap C Naha; Kristen C Lau; Peter Chhour; Renee Hastings; Brianna F Moon; Joel M Stein; Walter R T Witschey; Elizabeth S McDonald; Andrew D A Maidment; David P Cormode
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Exploring silver as a contrast agent for contrast-enhanced dual-energy X-ray breast imaging.

Authors:  R Karunamuni; A Tsourkas; A D A Maidment
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Use of Standardized Uptake Value Ratios Decreases Interreader Variability of [18F] Florbetapir PET Brain Scan Interpretation.

Authors:  A P Nayate; J G Dubroff; J E Schmitt; I Nasrallah; R Kishore; D Mankoff; D A Pryma
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.