Literature DB >> 21128030

Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Gregory P Nicholson1, Eric J Strauss, Seth L Sherman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scapular notching is a unique complication of Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. While reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has revolutionized the treatment of pseudoparalysis secondary to cuff tear arthropathy, the implications of scapular notching with regard to patient function and implant stability remain unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We reviewed literature to determine the etiology and incidence, radiographic progression and effect on implant stability, relationship with postoperative function, and risk factors for the development of scapular notching.
METHODS: We reviewed PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE with the terms "reverse total shoulder arthroplasty" and "scapular notching." Inclusion criteria were a level of evidence of IV (or better). Twenty-four articles were selected after manual review.
RESULTS: Scapular notching after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is due to repetitive contact between the polyethylene of the humeral component and the inferior scapular neck during adduction, leading to erosion of the scapular neck, polyethylene wear, joint inflammation, and potential implant loosening. Scapular notching appears between 6 and 14 months postoperatively, with an incidence of 44% to 96%. Radiographic progression and effect on patient function remain controversial. Predictors of scapular notching include surgical approach, glenoid wear, preoperative diagnosis, infraspinatus muscle quality, cranial-caudal positioning, and tilt of the glenosphere.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved understanding of the etiology and risk factors for scapular notching will lead to refinement in implant technology and surgical technique that may translate into improved patient function and implant longevity for Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21128030      PMCID: PMC3148378          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1720-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  [Mechanical complications of total shoulder inverted prosthesis].

Authors:  C Delloye; D Joris; A Colette; A Eudier; J E Dubuc
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2002-06

2.  Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Clément M L Werner; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; R Michael Greiwe; Mark A Frankle; Steven Siegal; William E Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Jonathan C Levy; Mark A Frankle; Derek Cuff; Tony S Keller; Derek R Pupello; William E Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Gerber; Scott D Pennington; Richard W Nyffeler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications.

Authors:  Carl Wierks; Richard L Skolasky; Jong Hun Ji; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The influence of rotator cuff disease on the results of shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Aziz Boulahia; Jean-Francois Kempf; Pascal Boileau; Chantal Nemoz; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

10.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Classifications in Brief: The Nerot-Sirveaux Classification for Scapular Notching.

Authors:  Bradley L Young; Colin K Cantrell; Nady Hamid
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Which way around does this go? A simple method for ensuring the correct glenosphere offset.

Authors:  Saqib Javed; Richard Heasley; Matt Ravenscroft
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2013-10-08

4.  Is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty a feasible treatment option for failed shoulder arthroplasty? A retrospective study of 44 cases with special regards to stemless and stemmed primary implants.

Authors:  M Holschen; B Franetzki; K-A Witt; D Liem; J Steinbeck
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-15

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral prosthesis without a stem: survivorship, early to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study from an independent centre.

Authors:  Andreas Leonidou; Siddharth Virani; Christopher Buckle; Clarence Yeoh; Jaikumar Relwani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-20

6.  Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; Joseph Choi; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients.

Authors:  C Iacobellis; A Berizzi; C Biz; A Camporese
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-06-11

9.  Analysis of complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Giuseppe Della Rotonda; Michele Ciccarelli; Fabio Cautiero
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

10.  Early clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an eccentric all-polyethylene glenosphere to treat failed hemiarthroplasty and the sequelae of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Antonio Tartarone; John W Sperling; Paolo Paladini; Elisabetta Fabbri; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.