Literature DB >> 18325795

Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model.

Sergio Gutiérrez1, Jonathan C Levy, Mark A Frankle, Derek Cuff, Tony S Keller, Derek R Pupello, William E Lee.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prosthetic design and surgical technique of reverse shoulder implants on total abduction range of motion and impingement on the inferior scapular neck. Custom implants in three glenosphere diameters (30, 36, and 42 mm), with 3 different centers of rotation offsets (0, +5, and +10 mm), were placed into a Sawbones scapula (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) in 3 different positions: superior, center, and inferior glenoid. Humeral sockets were manufactured with a 130 degrees , 150 degrees , and 170 degrees neck-shaft angle. Four independent factors (glenosphere diameter, center of rotation offset, glenosphere position on the glenoid, and humeral neck-shaft angle) were compared with the 2 dependent factors of range of motion and inferior scapular impingement. Center of rotation offset had the largest effect on range of motion, followed by glenosphere position. Neck-shaft angle had the largest effect on inferior scapular impingement, followed by glenosphere position. This information may be useful to the surgeon when deciding on the appropriate reverse implant.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18325795     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  44 in total

1.  The clinical and radiographical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric glenosphere.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Alexandre Terrier; Julien Ston; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 7.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

10.  The use of an eccentric glenosphere compared with a concentric glenosphere in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: two-year minimum follow-up results.

Authors:  Carlo Felice De Biase; Giovanni Ziveri; Marco Delcogliano; Francesca de Caro; Stefano Gumina; Mario Borroni; Alessandro Castagna; Roberto Postacchini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.