Literature DB >> 16990024

Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Sergio Gutiérrez1, R Michael Greiwe, Mark A Frankle, Steven Siegal, William E Lee.   

Abstract

There has been renewed interest in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral arthritis with concomitant rotator cuff deficiency. Failure of the prosthesis at the glenoid attachment site remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to examine glenoid component stability with regard to the angle of implantation. This investigation entailed a biomechanical analysis to evaluate forces and micromotion in glenoid components attached to 12 polyurethane blocks at -15 degrees, 0 degrees, and +15 degrees of superior and inferior tilt. The 15 degrees inferior tilt had the most uniform compressive forces and the least amount of tensile forces and micromotion when compared with the 0 degrees and 15 degrees superiorly tilted baseplate. Our results suggest that implantation with an inferior tilt will reduce the incidence of mechanical failure of the glenoid component in a reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16990024     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  30 in total

Review 1.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Consequences of scapular anatomy for reversed total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Pieter-Jan De Roo; Georges Van Maele; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Optimal glenoid component inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. How to improve implant stability.

Authors:  P Randelli; F Randelli; P Arrigoni; V Ragone; R D'Ambrosi; P Masuzzo; P Cabitza; G Banfi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

Review 4.  How reverse shoulder arthroplasty works.

Authors:  Matthew Walker; Jordan Brooks; Matthew Willis; Mark Frankle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Sebastian Mukka; Erling Englund; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching?

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Philippe Sauzières; Denis Katz; Ibrahim Kalouche; Alexandre Sahin Kilinc
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Burns; Tym Frank; Cari M Whyne; Patrick Dg Henry
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-10-26

9.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

10.  Computer-Assisted Surgery in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Experience.

Authors:  Andrea Giorgini; Luigi Tarallo; Michele Novi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.