Literature DB >> 26605252

Analysis of complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Raffaele Russo1, Giuseppe Della Rotonda2, Michele Ciccarelli1, Fabio Cautiero1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: the aim of this study was to analyze complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) used to treat different shoulder diseases.
METHODS: from March 2000 to March 2013, 195 RTSA were implanted by the senior Author. The indications for reverse prosthesis surgery were secondary osteoarthritis (OA) in 49 cases, irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT) in 48 cases, and complex humeral fractures in 75 cases, while 19 were patients requiring surgical revision for first prosthesis implant. We used different prostheses with different designs.
RESULTS: the clinical and radiological results of all the patients were analyzed retrospectively at an average follow-up of 7 years. The cases were divided into four groups on the basis of the diagnosis and complications were classified as perioperative, postoperative, or late. The mean total Constant score improved from 28 to 69 points in the OA group; from 21 to 70.8 points in the irreparable RCT group, to 76.4 in the fracture group, and from 16.6 to 59.8 points in the revision group. Scapular notching was observed in 59 cases (30.2%). Thirty-three other complications (16.9%) were observed, namely: hematomas (n=3), instability of the humeral component (n=1), scapular spine fractures (n=2), ulnar nerve deficit (n=2), long thoracic nerve palsy (n=2), deep infections (n=2), periprosthetic fractures (n=6), glenoid fractures (n=2), implant loosening (n=2), anterior deltoid muscle deficiency (n=2) and periarticular heterotopic calcifications (n=9).
CONCLUSIONS: the rates of complications, especially fractures, reported in the present study were lower than those reported in the current literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; results; reverse shoulder prosthesis; surgical technique

Year:  2015        PMID: 26605252      PMCID: PMC4634805          DOI: 10.11138/jts/2015.3.2.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joints        ISSN: 2512-9090


  12 in total

Review 1.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Complications rates, reoperation rates, and the learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gordon I Groh; Griffin M Groh
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Reconstruction techniques in comparison for reverse shoulder trauma prosthesis in the elderly: a follow-up between 2 and 4 years.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Fabio Cautiero; Alberto Fontanarosa; Giuseppe della Rotonda; Giuliana Valerio
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures and failed management after proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Thomas G Martin; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years.

Authors:  Robert A Sershon; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Emery C Lin; Kevin C McGill; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without subscapularis repair for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  F A Grassi; I Zorzolo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

7.  Dilute betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Cara A Cipriano; Mario Moric; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?

Authors:  Luc Favard; Christophe Levigne; Cécile Nerot; Christian Gerber; Lieven De Wilde; Daniel Mole
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Matthew D Williams; Joanne E Labriola; Hussein A Elkousy; Gary M Gartsman; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Shoulder arthroplasty in the face of acute fracture: puzzle pieces.

Authors:  John J Brems
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has higher perioperative implant complications and transfusion rates than total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mina Botros; Emily J Curry; Jonathan Yin; Andrew Jawa; Josef K Eichinger; Xinning Li
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 2.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.