Literature DB >> 19411640

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Christian Gerber1, Scott D Pennington, Richard W Nyffeler.   

Abstract

The radical changes in prosthetic design made in the mid 1980s transformed the historically poorly performing reverse ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis into a highly successful salvage implant for pseudoparalytic, severely rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. Moving the center of rotation more medial and distal as well as implanting a large glenoid hemisphere that articulates with a humeral cup in 155 degrees of valgus are the biomechanical keys to sometimes spectacular short- to mid-term results. Use of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty device allows salvage of injuries that previously were beyond surgical treatment. However, this technique has a complication rate approximately three times that of conventional arthroplasty. Radiographic and clinical results appear to deteriorate over time. Proper patient selection and attention to technical details are needed to reduce the currently high complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411640     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200905000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  78 in total

Review 1.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Surgical management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Brandon E Earp; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

5.  Benefits of a metallic lateralized baseplate prolonged by a long metallic post in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to address glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Johanna Sekri; Jean Kany; Imen Nidtahar; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Grégory Moineau; Yannick Roussanne; Kieran O'Shea
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Musa Citak; Darrick Lo; Aaron J Krych; Edward V Craig; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Ten questions on prosthetic shoulder infection.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Pinder; Joshua Cy Ong; R Stephen Bale; Ian A Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-03-08

9.  Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amar Malhas; Abbas Rashid; Dave Copas; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-05-06

10.  Difference in clinical outcome between total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty used in hemiarthroplasty revision surgery.

Authors:  Bas Pieter Hartel; Tjarco D Alta; Miguel E Sewnath; Willem J Willems
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.