Literature DB >> 12124542

[Mechanical complications of total shoulder inverted prosthesis].

C Delloye1, D Joris, A Colette, A Eudier, J E Dubuc.   

Abstract

Our series of inverted prosthesis included 5 patients with a mean age of 73 +/- 6 years. In 4 cases, the implant was performed as a surgical revision. The follow up was 81 +/- 15 months. Three shoulders were pain free whereas two caused a dull pain after a free interval due to mechanical complications. The mean active elevation was 72 degrees while external rotation was - 2 degrees. The adjusted Constant score passed from 32 to 60. In case of complications, the score dropped to 32. Mechanical complications were important with in one case, an unscrening of the glenosphere and in two cases, a loosening of the glenoid prosthesis. This last and major complication occurred 6 years after surgery and was promoted by the occurrence of a progressive bone erosion in the scapula. This gap represented an attempt to accomodate the medial part of the humeral prosthesis under the scapula when the arm is at rest or in adduction. The concept of an inverted prosthesis is attractive and this implant remains one of the options in cuff-tear arthropathy. Our results were not as good as those reported by others but most of ours patients had been already operated before. The occurrence of an osseous gap on pilar of scapula may lead to failure of this prosthesis. This gap remains a threath as it can progress and as such warrants a design alteration of the prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12124542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  20 in total

Review 1.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Glenosphere disengagement: a potentially serious default in reverse shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Lieven De Wilde; Daniel Molé; Luc Favard; Philippe Debeer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Consequences of scapular anatomy for reversed total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Pieter-Jan De Roo; Georges Van Maele; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Contribution of the reverse endoprosthesis to glenohumeral kinematics.

Authors:  Jeroen H M Bergmann; M de Leeuw; Thomas W J Janssen; DirkJan H E J Veeger; W J Willems
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Which way around does this go? A simple method for ensuring the correct glenosphere offset.

Authors:  Saqib Javed; Richard Heasley; Matt Ravenscroft
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2013-10-08

Review 6.  Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Molé; Frank Wein; Charles Dézaly; Philippe Valenti; François Sirveaux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching?

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Philippe Sauzières; Denis Katz; Ibrahim Kalouche; Alexandre Sahin Kilinc
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Smithers; Allan A Young; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

9.  Difference in clinical outcome between total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty used in hemiarthroplasty revision surgery.

Authors:  Bas Pieter Hartel; Tjarco D Alta; Miguel E Sewnath; Willem J Willems
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.