Literature DB >> 28024662

Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Josie Elwell1, Joseph Choi2, Ryan Willing3.   

Abstract

Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) could improve functional outcomes and mitigate scapular notching, a commonly occurring complication of the procedure. However, resulting increases in torque at the bone-implant interface may negatively affect initial fixation of the glenoid-side component, especially if only two fixation screws can be placed. Shoulder-specific finite element (FE) models of four fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were constructed. Scapular geometry and material property distributions were derived from CT data. Generic baseplates with two and four fixation screws were virtually implanted, after which superiorly-oriented shear loads, accompanied by a compressive load, were applied incrementally further from the glenoid surface to simulate lateralization of the COR. Relationships between lateralization, adduction range of motion (ROM), the number of fixation screws and micromotion of the baseplate (initial implant fixation) were characterized. Lateralization significantly increases micromotion (p=0.015) and adduction ROM (p=0.001). Using two, versus four, baseplate fixation screws significantly increases micromotion (p=0.008). The effect of lateralization and the number of screws on adduction ROM and baseplate fixation is variable on a shoulder-specific basis. Trade-offs exist between functional outcomes, namely adduction ROM, and initial implant fixation and the negative effect of lateralization on implant fixation is amplified when only two fixation screws are used. The possibility of lateralizing the COR in order to improve functional outcomes of the procedure should be considered on a patient-specific basis accounting for factors such as availability and quality of bone stock.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adduction range of motion; Finite element modelling; Fixation; Lateralization; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28024662      PMCID: PMC5309173          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  21 in total

1.  Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carolyn M Hettrich; Vijay N Permeswaran; Jessica E Goetz; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Primary stability of inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A finite element study.

Authors:  Soo-Won Chae; Haea Lee; Soo Min Kim; Juneyoung Lee; Seung-Ho Han; Soung-Yon Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  In vitro and finite element analysis of glenoid bone/baseplate interaction in the reverse shoulder design.

Authors:  Nazeem A Virani; Melinda Harman; Ke Li; Jonathan Levy; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Charles A Comiskey; Zong-Ping Luo; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Optimizing glenosphere position and fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Part Two: The three-column concept.

Authors:  C Scott Humphrey; James D Kelly; Tom R Norris
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  In vivo gleno-humeral joint loads during forward flexion and abduction.

Authors:  G Bergmann; F Graichen; A Bender; A Rohlmann; A Halder; A Beier; P Westerhoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The effects of progressive lateralization of the joint center of rotation of reverse total shoulder implants.

Authors:  Oren Costantini; Daniel S Choi; Andreas Kontaxis; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Initial glenoid component fixation in "reverse" total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Melinda Harman; Mark Frankle; Matt Vasey; Scott Banks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Need for CT-based bone density modelling in finite element analysis of a shoulder arthroplasty revealed through a novel method for result analysis.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.411

10.  Validation of a finite element model of the human elbow for determining cartilage contact mechanics.

Authors:  Ryan T Willing; Emily A Lalone; Hannah Shannon; James A Johnson; Graham J W King
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

3.  Effect of RSA glenoid baseplate central fixation on micromotion and bone stress.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonnevialle; Laurent Geais; Jacobus Hendrik Müller; Julien Berhouet
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-08-01

4.  Clinical comparison of humeral-lateralization reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear and patients with cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Jae-Hoo Lee; Yong-Min Chun; Doo-Sup Kim; Doo-Hyung Lee; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-17

5.  Impact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mehul A Dharia; Jeffrey E Bischoff; David Schneider
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.