Literature DB >> 26316123

Dichotic Listening Can Improve Perceived Clarity of Music in Cochlear Implant Users.

Nicolas Vannson1, Hamish Innes-Brown2, Jeremy Marozeau3.   

Abstract

Musical enjoyment for cochlear implant (CI) recipients is often reported to be unsatisfactory. Our goal was to determine whether the musical experience of postlingually deafened adult CI recipients could be enriched by presenting the bass and treble clef parts of short polyphonic piano pieces separately to each ear (dichotic). Dichotic presentation should artificially enhance the lateralization cues of each part and help the listeners to better segregate them and thus provide greater clarity. We also hypothesized that perception of the intended emotion of the pieces and their overall enjoyment would be enhanced in the dichotic mode compared with the monophonic (both parts in the same ear) and the diotic mode (both parts in both ears). Twenty-eight piano pieces specifically composed to induce sad or happy emotions were selected. The tempo of the pieces, which ranged from lento to presto covaried with the intended emotion (from sad to happy). Thirty participants (11 normal-hearing listeners, 11 bimodal CI and hearing-aid users, and 8 bilaterally implanted CI users) participated in this study. Participants were asked to rate the perceived clarity, the intended emotion, and their preference of each piece in different listening modes. Results indicated that dichotic presentation produced small significant improvements in subjective ratings based on perceived clarity and preference. We also found that preference and clarity ratings were significantly higher for pieces with fast tempi compared with slow tempi. However, no significant differences between diotic and dichotic presentation were found for the participants' preference ratings, or their judgments of intended emotion.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; auditory scene analysis; emotions; music perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26316123      PMCID: PMC4593516          DOI: 10.1177/2331216515598971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Hear        ISSN: 2331-2165            Impact factor:   3.293


  26 in total

Review 1.  How the brain separates sounds.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Anastasios Sarampalis; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference.

Authors:  Sylvain Choisel; Florian Wickelmaier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  K Veekmans; L Ressel; J Mueller; M Vischer; S J Brockmeier
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Brokx; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; B Lepage
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The acoustic and perceptual cues affecting melody segregation for listeners with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Perception of Musical Tension in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Steffen Spangmose; Jens Hjortkjær; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Interactive Evaluation of a Music Preprocessing Scheme for Cochlear Implants Based on Spectral Complexity Reduction.

Authors:  Johannes Gauer; Anil Nagathil; Rainer Martin; Jan Peter Thomas; Christiane Völter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.