Literature DB >> 24441739

Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.

Kathryn H Arehart1, Naomi B H Croghan, Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent evidence suggests that age might affect the ability of listeners to process fundamental frequency cues in speech, and that this difficulty might impact the ability of older listeners to use and combine envelope and fine structure cues available in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing. The purpose of this article is to examine whether this difficulty extends to music. Specially, this study focuses on whether older listeners have a decreased ability to use and combine different types of cues in the perception of melody and timbre.
DESIGN: A group of older listeners with normal to near-normal hearing and a group of younger listeners with normal hearing participated in the melody and timbre recognition tasks of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. The recognition tasks were completed for five different processing conditions: (1) an unprocessed condition; (2) an eight-channel vocoding condition that simulated a traditional cochlear implant and contained temporal envelope cues; (3) a simulation of electro-acoustic stimulation (sEAS) that included a low-pass acoustic component and high-pass vocoded portion, and which provided fine structure and envelope cues; (4) a condition that included only the low-pass acoustic portion of the sEAS; and (5) a condition that included only the high-frequency vocoded portion of the sEAS stimulus.
RESULTS: Melody recognition was excellent for both younger and older listeners in the conditions containing the unprocessed stimuli, the full sEAS stimuli, and the low-pass sEAS stimuli. Melody recognition was significantly worse in the cochlear-implant simulation condition, especially for the older group of listeners. Performance on the timbre task was highest for the unprocessed condition, and progressively decreased for the sEAS and cochlear-implant simulation conditions. Compared with younger listeners, older listeners had significantly poorer timbre recognition for all processing conditions. For melody recognition, the unprocessed low-frequency portion of the sEAS stimulus was the primary factor determining improved performance in the sEAS condition compared with the cochlear-implant simulation. For timbre recognition, both the unprocessed low-frequency and high-frequency vocoded portions of the sEAS stimulus contributed to sEAS improvement in the younger group. In contrast, most listeners in the older group were not able to take advantage of the high-frequency vocoded portion of the sEAS stimulus for timbre recognition.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this simulation study support the idea that older listeners will have diminished timbre and melody perception in traditional cochlear-implant listening due to degraded envelope processing. The findings also suggest that music perception by older listeners with cochlear implants will be improved with the addition of low-frequency residual hearing. However, these improvements might not be comparable for all dimensions of music perception. That is, more improvement might be evident for tasks that rely primarily on the low-frequency portion of the electro-acoustic stimulus (e.g., melody recognition), and less improvement might be evident in situations that require across-frequency integration of cues (e.g., timbre perception).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24441739      PMCID: PMC3970813          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a69a5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  46 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; George Woodworth; Maureen A Mehr; John Knutson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Rachel Cruz; J Ackland Jones; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Sherri L Smith; Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Richard H Wilson; Ewen N Macdonald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.

Authors:  Frank A Russo; D Timothy Ives; Huiwen Goy; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski; John F Knutson; Christopher Turner; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2012

9.  Deficits of musical timbre perception after unilateral temporal-lobe lesion revealed with multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Séverine Samson; Robert J Zatorre; James O Ramsay
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reduction of the Harmonic Series Influences Musical Enjoyment With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  John S Nemer; Gavriel D Kohlberg; Dean M Mancuso; Brianna M Griffin; Michael V Certo; Stephanie Y Chen; Michael B Chun; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

3.  Singing Proficiency of Members of a Choir Formed by Prelingually Deafened Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Qi Liang; Haotong Chen; Yanjun Liu; Li Xu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The effects of aging and musicianship on the use of auditory streaming cues.

Authors:  Sarah A Sauvé; Jeremy Marozeau; Benjamin Rich Zendel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Susceptibility to Postoperative Changes in Music Appreciation in Elderly Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Jee-Hye Chung; Min-Kyu Kim; Da Beom Heo; Jong Bin Lee; Jin Woong Choi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Melodic Contour Identification Reflects the Cognitive Threshold of Aging.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.