Literature DB >> 20975102

Prognostic value of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in progressing metastatic prostate cancer.

Gustavo S P Meirelles1, Heiko Schöder, Gregory C Ravizzini, Mithat Gönen, Josef J Fox, John Humm, Michael J Morris, Howard I Scher, Steven M Larson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and bone scans (BS) in the assessment of osseous lesions in patients with progressing prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In a prospective imaging trial, 43 patients underwent FDG-PET and BS prior to experimental therapies. Bone scan index (BSI) and standardized uptake value (SUV) on FDG-PET were recorded. Patients were followed until death (n = 36) or at least 5 years (n = 7). Imaging findings were correlated with survival.
RESULTS: Osseous lesions were detected in 39 patients on BS and 32 on FDG-PET (P = 0.01). Follow-up was available for 105 FDG-positive lesions, and 84 (80%) became positive on subsequent BS. Prognosis correlated inversely with SUV (median survival 14.4 versus 32.8 months if SUVmax > 6.10 versus ≤ 6.10; P = 0.002) and BSI (14.7 versus 28.2 months if BSI > 1.27 versus < 1.27; P = 0.004). Only SUV was an independent factor in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: This study of progressive prostate cancer confirms earlier work that BSI is a strong prognostic factor. Most FDG-only lesions at baseline become detectable on follow-up BS, suggesting their strong clinical relevance. FDG SUV is an independent prognostic factor and provides complementary prognostic information. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20975102      PMCID: PMC3402086          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  24 in total

1.  FDG-PET for prediction of survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  L F de Geus-Oei; B Wiering; P F M Krabbe; T J M Ruers; C J A Punt; W J G Oyen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Biology of progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: directed therapies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Morris; Timothy Akhurst; Iman Osman; Rodolfo Nunez; Homer Macapinlac; Karen Siedlecki; David Verbel; Lawrence Schwartz; Steven M Larson; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in Hürthle cell thyroid cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel A Pryma; Heiko Schöder; Mithat Gönen; Richard J Robbins; Steven M Larson; Henry W D Yeung
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Ariela Noy; Mithat Gönen; Lijun Weng; David Green; Yusuf E Erdi; Steven M Larson; Henry W D Yeung
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R J Wong; D T Lin; H Schöder; S G Patel; M Gonen; S Wolden; D G Pfister; J P Shah; S M Larson; D H Kraus
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Serial 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to monitor treatment of bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer predicts time to progression (TTP).

Authors:  Jennifer M Specht; Stephen L Tam; Brenda F Kurland; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Hannah M Linden; Georgiana K Ellis; Erin K Schubert; Lisa K Dunnwald; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer: morphologic and metabolic monitoring of response to systemic therapy with integrated PET/CT.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Cristina Gamez; Shaheenah Dawood; Henry W D Yeung; Massimo Cristofanilli; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  18F-FDG PET/CT as an indicator of progression-free and overall survival in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Colleen M Costelloe; Homer A Macapinlac; John E Madewell; Nancy E Fitzgerald; Osama R Mawlawi; Eric M Rohren; A Kevin Raymond; Valerae O Lewis; Peter M Anderson; Roland L Bassett; Robyn K Harrell; Edith M Marom
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Sarcoma tumor FDG uptake measured by PET and patient outcome: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Yudi Powitan; Kingshuk Roy Chandhury; Cheryl Vernon; James D Bruckner; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  49 in total

1.  Simultaneous PET/MRI in the Evaluation of Breast and Prostate Cancer Using Combined Na[18F] F and [18F]FDG: a Focus on Skeletal Lesions.

Authors:  Ida Sonni; Ryogo Minamimoto; Lucia Baratto; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Andreas M Loening; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Critical considerations on the combined use of ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-fluoride for PET assessment of metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Jeremy C Durack; Serge K Lyashchenko; Sarah M Cheal; Volkan Beylergil; Robert A Lefkowitz; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Danny F Martinez; Alex Mak Fung; Stephen B Solomon; Mithat Gönen; Glenn Heller; Massimo Loda; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Jarett L Feldman; Joseph R Osborne; Jason S Lewis; Victor E Reuter; Wolfgang A Weber; Neil H Bander; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson; Michael J Morris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Prediction of Time to Hormonal Treatment Failure in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Erik M Velez; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; Patrick M Colletti; David I Quinn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  PET of Glucose Metabolism and Cellular Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

Review 7.  Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Steven Larson; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.