Literature DB >> 23429934

Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations.

Hossein Jadvar1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a major public health problem in developed countries. The remarkable biological and clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer provides unique opportunities as well as challenges for the diagnostic imaging evaluation of this prevalent disease. The disease is characterized by a natural history that ranges from localized slowly growing hormone-dependent tumor progressing to metastatic hormone-refractory disease. PET is an ideal imaging tool for noninvasive interrogation of the underlying tumor biology. (18)F-FDG is the most common PET radiotracer used for oncological applications based upon elevated glucose metabolism in malignant tissue in comparison to normal tissue. FDG uptake in prostate cancer depends on tumor differentiation with low accumulation in well-differentiated tumors and high uptake in aggressive poorly differentiated tumors. Cumulative current evidence suggests that FDG PET may be useful in detection of disease in a small fraction of patients with biochemical recurrence, in the imaging evaluation of extent and treatment response in metastatic disease and in prediction of patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23429934      PMCID: PMC3681838          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2361-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  42 in total

1.  The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Hiroji Uemura; Futoshi Sano; Hideyuki Terao; Yoji Nagashima; Shoji Yamanaka; Kazuya Shizukuishi; Ukihide Tateishi; Yoshinobu Kubota; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Rising PSA after a radical treatment.

Authors:  P Carroll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Developing imaging strategies for castration resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Josef J Fox; Michael J Morris; Steven M Larson; Heiko Schöder; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Assessment of PET tracer uptake in hormone-independent and hormone-dependent xenograft prostate cancer mouse models.

Authors:  Damaris Kukuk; Gerald Reischl; Olivier Raguin; Stefan Wiehr; Martin S Judenhofer; Carsten Calaminus; Valerie S Honndorf; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Tanja Schönberger; Olivier Duchamp; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Glucose metabolism of human prostate cancer mouse xenografts.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Li Xiankui; Antranik Shahinian; Ryan Park; Michel Tohme; Jacek Pinski; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 7.  Novel tracers and their development for the imaging of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human cancer cell lines is increased by hypoxia.

Authors:  A C Clavo; R S Brown; R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Anatomic and Molecular Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eric T Miller; Amirali Salmasi; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Writing PET into existence.

Authors:  A Chiti; M Kirienko; E Incerti; M Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Functional expression of sodium-glucose transporters in cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Scafoglio; Bruce A Hirayama; Vladimir Kepe; Jie Liu; Chiara Ghezzi; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Neda A Moatamed; Jiaoti Huang; Hermann Koepsell; Jorge R Barrio; Ernest M Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of NaF and FDG PET/CT for assessment of treatment response in castration-resistant prostate cancers with osseous metastases.

Authors:  Urban Simoncic; Scott Perlman; Glenn Liu; Mary Jane Staab; Jane Elizabeth Straus; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Is There Use for FDG-PET in Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.446

7.  Multisite Experience of the Safety, Detection Rate and Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Imaging in the Staging of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tore Bach-Gansmo; Cristina Nanni; Peter T Nieh; Lucia Zanoni; Tronde Velde Bogsrud; Heidi Sletten; Katrine Andersen Korsan; J Kieboom; Funmilayo I Tade; Oluwaseun Odewole; Albert Chau; Penelope Ward; Mark M Goodman; Stefano Fanti; David M Schuster; Frode Willoch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  [Significance of PSMA imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  C Gasch; C Düwel; K Kopka; C Kratochwil; M Vinsensia; M Eiber; T Maurer; U Haberkorn; B Hadaschik; F L Giesel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  PET of Glucose Metabolism and Cellular Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.