Literature DB >> 16936185

FDG-PET for prediction of survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

L F de Geus-Oei1, B Wiering, P F M Krabbe, T J M Ruers, C J A Punt, W J G Oyen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study focuses on the prognostic value of pretreatment metabolic activity in metastases as measured with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), as an indicator of survival in colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective series of 152 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, of whom 67 were treated with resection of metastases and 85 with chemotherapy, standardized uptake values (SUV) as measured with FDG-PET, were calculated prior to treatment. Survival probabilities were estimated by Cox proportional regression analysis. For Kaplan-Meier analysis SUV was stratified by the median value. Survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: SUV in metastases was a significant predictor for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.30, P = 0.002), independent of the subsequent treatment. According to the median value of the patient population a low (SUV <4.26) and high uptake group (SUV >4.26) was defined. The median survival and the 2- and 3-year survival rates were 32 months, 59% and 45%, respectively, in the low-uptake group and 19 months, 37% and 28%, respectively, in the high-uptake group (P = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: A significant survival benefit was observed in patients with low FDG uptake in metastases of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16936185     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic value of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in progressing metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo S P Meirelles; Heiko Schöder; Gregory C Ravizzini; Mithat Gönen; Josef J Fox; John Humm; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  PET scans as a predictive marker of survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minsig Choi; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Molecular imaging of solid tumors: exploiting the potential.

Authors:  Wim J G Oyen; Winette T A van der Graaf
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography/computer tomography: challenge to conventional imaging modalities in evaluating primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Is early response by (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography a predictor of long-term outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Maria Nirvana da Cruz Formiga; Marcello Ferretti Fanelli; Aldo Lourenço Abadde Dettino; Ulisses Ribaldo Nicolau; Marcelo Cavicchioli; Eduardo Nóbrega Pereira Lima; Celso Abdon Lopes de Mello
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

6.  Reproducibility of functional volume and activity concentration in 18F-FDG PET/CT of liver metastases in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Linda Heijmen; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Johannes H W de Wilt; Dimitris Visvikis; Mathieu Hatt; Eric P Visser; Johan Bussink; Cornelis J A Punt; Wim J G Oyen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour heterogeneity predict CRC liver metastasis shrinkage following bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6.

Authors:  J P B O'Connor; C J Rose; A Jackson; Y Watson; S Cheung; F Maders; B J Whitcher; C Roberts; G A Buonaccorsi; G Thompson; A R Clamp; G C Jayson; G J M Parker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Standardized uptake value in para-aortic lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in patients with primary advanced squamous cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tzu-Chen Yen; Lai-Chu See; Chyong-Huey Lai; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Angel Chao; Swei Hsueh; Ji-Hong Hong; Ting-Chang Chang; Koon-Kwan Ng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Prognostic significance of (18)FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Xia; Jianjun Liu; Cheng Wu; Shaoli Song; Linjun Tong; Gang Huang; Yuanbo Feng; Yansheng Jiang; Yewei Liu; Ting Yin; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.