Literature DB >> 17268819

Serial 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to monitor treatment of bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer predicts time to progression (TTP).

Jennifer M Specht1, Stephen L Tam, Brenda F Kurland, Julie R Gralow, Robert B Livingston, Hannah M Linden, Georgiana K Ellis, Erin K Schubert, Lisa K Dunnwald, David A Mankoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The response of bone-dominant (BD) breast cancer to therapy is difficult to assess by conventional imaging. Our preliminary studies have shown that quantitative serial 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) correlates with therapeutic response of BD breast cancer, but the relationship to long-term outcome measures is unknown. Our goal was to evaluate the prognostic power of serial FDG PET in BD breast cancer patients undergoing treatment.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 405 consecutive breast cancer patients referred for FDG PET. Of these, 28 demonstrated metastatic BD breast cancer, were undergoing treatment, had at least 2 serial PET scans, and had abnormal FDG uptake on the first scan. Standardized uptake value (SUV) for the most conspicuous bone lesion at the initial scan, absolute change in SUV over an interval of 1-17 months, and percent change in SUV were considered as predictors of time-to-progression (TTP) and time to skeletal-related event (t-SRE).
RESULTS: Using proportional hazards regression, smaller percentage decreases in SUV (or increases in SUV) were associated with a shorter TTP (P < 0.006). A patient with no change in SUV was twice as likely to progress compared to a patient with a 42% median decrease in SUV. A higher SUV on the initial FDG PET predicted a shorter t-SRE (hazard ratio = 1.30, P < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in serial FDG PET may predict TTP in BD metastatic breast cancer patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to validate changes in FDG PET as a surrogate endpoint for treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268819     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9435-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  30 in total

1.  Assessment of response to endocrine therapy using FDG PET/CT in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nina Mortazavi-Jehanno; Anne-Laure Giraudet; Laurence Champion; Florence Lerebours; Elise Le Stanc; Veronique Edeline; Olivier Madar; Dominique Bellet; Alain Paul Pecking; Jean-Louis Alberini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Whither the PET scan? The role of PET imaging in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gennari; Arnoldo Piccardo; Vania Altrinetti; Davide Corradengo; Giampiero Villavecchia; Andrea De Censi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) to evaluate the response of bone metastases to non-surgical treatment.

Authors:  Peter Denzil Correa; Raj Kumar Shrimali; Sai Han; Mohammed Rizwanullah
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-05-06

4.  C11-acetate and F-18 FDG PET for men with prostate cancer bone metastases: relative findings and response to therapy.

Authors:  Evan Y Yu; Mark Muzi; Joy A Hackenbracht; Brian B Rezvani; Jeanne M Link; Robert Bruce Montgomery; Celestia S Higano; Janet F Eary; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  Prognostic value of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in progressing metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo S P Meirelles; Heiko Schöder; Gregory C Ravizzini; Mithat Gönen; Josef J Fox; John Humm; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A phase 2 study of 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol positron emission tomography (FES-PET) as a marker of hormone sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  Lanell M Peterson; Brenda F Kurland; Erin K Schubert; Jeanne M Link; V K Gadi; Jennifer M Specht; Janet F Eary; Peggy Porter; Lalitha K Shankar; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alexandre Cochet; Bruno Coudert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Salim Kanoun; François Brunotte; Pierre Fumoleau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-05

8.  VALIDATION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT BY BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH BONE-ONLY METASTATIC BREAST CANCERS DURING ZOLEDRONIC ACID TREATMENT: COMPARISON WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT.

Authors:  Shirou Ishii; Ken Kikuchi; Masayuki Miyajima; Kotaro Sakuma; Fumio Shishido
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-03

9.  Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)fluoro-D-glucose and (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions.

Authors:  Selene Capitanio; Francesca Bongioanni; Arnoldo Piccardo; Claudio Campus; Roberta Gonella; Lucia Tixi; Mehrdad Naseri; Michele Pennone; Vania Altrinetti; Ambra Buschiazzo; Irene Bossert; Francesco Fiz; Andrea Bruno; Andrea DeCensi; Gianmario Sambuceti; Silvia Morbelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28

Review 10.  PET and PET/CT imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.