Literature DB >> 22840598

Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Carina Mari Aparici1, Youngho Seo.   

Abstract

Functional radionuclide imaging modalities, now commonly combined with anatomical imaging modalities computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]/CT, positron emission tomography [PET]/CT, and PET/magnetic resonance imaging), are promising tools for the management of prostate cancer, particularly for therapeutic implications. Sensitive detection capability of prostate cancer using these imaging modalities is one issue; however, the treatment of prostate cancer using the information that can be obtained from functional radionuclide imaging techniques is another challenging area. There are not many SPECT or PET radiotracers that can cover the full spectrum of the management of prostate cancer from initial detection to staging, prognosis predictor, and all the way to treatment response assessment. However, when used appropriately, the information from functional radionuclide imaging improves, and sometimes significantly changes, the whole course of the cancer management. The limitations of using SPECT and PET radiotracers with regard to therapeutic implications are not so much different from their limitations solely for the task of detecting prostate cancer; however, the specific imaging target and how this target is reliably imaged by SPECT and PET can potentially make significant impact in the treatment of prostate cancer. Finally, although the localized prostate cancer is considered manageable, there is still significant need for improvement in noninvasive imaging of metastatic prostate cancer, in treatment guidance, and in response assessment from functional imaging, including radionuclide-based techniques. In this review article, we present the rationale of using functional radionuclide imaging and the therapeutic implications for each of radionuclide imaging agent that have been studied in human subjects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840598      PMCID: PMC3408625          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  202 in total

1.  Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging.

Authors:  Jean Pouliot; Yongbok Kim; Etienne Lessard; I-Chow Hsu; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Synthesis and in vitro testing of J591 antibody-dendrimer conjugates for targeted prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Anil K Patri; Andrzej Myc; James Beals; Thommey P Thomas; Neil H Bander; James R Baker
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  11C/ 18F-choline PET or 11C/18F-acetate PET in prostate cancer: may a choice be recommended?

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Paolo Castellucci; Mohsen Farsad; Domenico Rubello; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alice Wang-Chesebro; Ping Xia; Joy Coleman; Clayton Akazawa; Mack Roach
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas Scherr; Peter W Swindle; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  18F-fluoroacetate: a potential acetate analog for prostate tumor imaging--in vivo evaluation of 18F-fluoroacetate versus 11C-acetate.

Authors:  Datta E Ponde; Carmen S Dence; Nobuyuki Oyama; Joonyoung Kim; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Richard Laforest; Barry A Siegel; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Prediction of myelotoxicity based on bone marrow radiation-absorbed dose: radioimmunotherapy studies using 90Y- and 177Lu-labeled J591 antibodies specific for prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley J Goldsmith; Klaus A Hamacher; Lale Kostakoglu; Shota Konishi; Mathew I Milowski; David M Nanus; Neil H Bander
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo.

Authors:  Jason P Holland; Vadim Divilov; Neil H Bander; Peter M Smith-Jones; Steven M Larson; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Bone health in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: the role of bisphosphonates.

Authors:  T J Polascik
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Wolfgang Loidl; Gabriele Broinger; Franz Stoiber; Ignac Foglman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Multisite Experience of the Safety, Detection Rate and Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Imaging in the Staging of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tore Bach-Gansmo; Cristina Nanni; Peter T Nieh; Lucia Zanoni; Tronde Velde Bogsrud; Heidi Sletten; Katrine Andersen Korsan; J Kieboom; Funmilayo I Tade; Oluwaseun Odewole; Albert Chau; Penelope Ward; Mark M Goodman; Stefano Fanti; David M Schuster; Frode Willoch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A Feasibility Study Showing [68Ga]Citrate PET Detects Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Spencer C Behr; Rahul Aggarwal; Youngho Seo; Carina M Aparici; Emily Chang; Kenneth T Gao; Dora H Tao; Eric J Small; Michael J Evans
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopic imaging for characterization of disease extent in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Ervis Sofroni; Naum Papanicolau; Omar Falou; Linda Sugar; Gerard Morton; Martin J Yaffe; Robert Nam; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael C Kolios; Hans T Chung; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  The dog prostate cancer (DPC-1) model: a reliable tool for molecular imaging of prostate tumors and metastases.

Authors:  Simone Chevalier; Serge Moffett; Eric Turcotte; Murillo Luz; Lyne Chauvette; Vilma Derbekyan; Eleonora Scarlata; Fatima Zouanat; Armen G Aprikian; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  Ultrasound Elastography of the Prostate Using an Unconstrained Modulus Reconstruction Technique: A Pilot Clinical Study.

Authors:  Seyed Reza Mousavi; Hassan Rivaz; Gregory J Czarnota; Abbas Samani; Ali Sadeghi-Naini
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 8.  The Dandelion Dilemma Revisited for Oligoprogression: Treat the Whole Lawn or Weed Selectively?

Authors:  P H Patel; D Palma; F McDonald; A C Tree
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  When to perform positron emission tomography/computed tomography or radionuclide bone scan in patients with recently diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carmelo Caldarella; Giorgio Treglia; Alessandro Giordano; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Localization and restaging of carcinoma prostate by 68Gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography in patients with biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Nikhil Seniaray; Ritu Verma; Sudhir Khanna; Ethel Belho; Ankur Pruthi; Harsh Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2020-07-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.