Literature DB >> 15837966

Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Heiko Schöder1, Ariela Noy, Mithat Gönen, Lijun Weng, David Green, Yusuf E Erdi, Steven M Larson, Henry W D Yeung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) is widely used for the staging of lymphoma. We investigated whether the intensity of tumor FDG uptake could differentiate between indolent and aggressive disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET studies of 97 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were untreated or had relapsed and/or persistent disease and had not received treatment within the last 6 months were analyzed, and the highest standardized uptake value (SUV) per study was recorded. Correlations were made with histopathology.
RESULTS: FDG uptake was lower in indolent than in aggressive lymphoma for patients with new (SUV, 7.0 +/- 3.1 v 19.6 +/- 9.3; P < .01) and relapsed (SUV, 6.3 +/- 2.7 v 18.1 +/- 10.9; P = .04) disease. Despite overlap between indolent and aggressive disease in the low SUV range (indolent, 2.3 to 13.0; aggressive, 3.2 to 43.0), all cases of indolent lymphoma had an SUV <or= 13. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that the SUV distinguished reasonably well between aggressive and indolent disease (area under ROC curve, 84.7%), and an SUV > 10 excluded indolent lymphoma with a specificity of 81%. With a higher cutoff for the SUV, the specificity would have been higher.
CONCLUSION: FDG uptake is lower in indolent than in aggressive lymphoma. Patients with NHL and SUV > 10 have a high likelihood for aggressive disease. This information may be helpful if there is discordance between biopsy and clinical behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837966     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  135 in total

1.  High maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) on PET scan is associated with shorter survival in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Dai Chihara; Yasuhiro Oki; Hiroshi Onoda; Hirofumi Taji; Kazuhito Yamamoto; Tsuneo Tamaki; Yasuo Morishima
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Early treatment response evaluation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--a pilot study comparing volumetric MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Xingchen Wu; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Pertovaara; Pasi Korkola; Ritva Järvenpää; Maija Rossi; Tiit Kööbi; Hannu Eskola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for staging patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Alain Luciani; Emmanuel Itti; Taoufik El-Gnaoui; Alexandre Vignaud; Pauline Beaussart; Shih-jui Lin; Karim Belhadj; Pierre Brugières; Eva Evangelista; Corinne Haioun; Michel Meignan; Alain Rahmouni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Discordant bone marrow involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Brudno; Tamar Tadmor; Stefania Pittaluga; Alina Nicolae; Aaron Polliack; Kieron Dunleavy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma proceeds by distinct oncogenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrew J Davies; Andreas Rosenwald; George Wright; Abigail Lee; Kim W Last; Dennis D Weisenburger; Wing C Chan; Jan Delabie; Rita M Braziel; Elias Campo; Randy D Gascoyne; Elaine S Jaffe; Konrad Muller-Hermelink; German Ott; Maria Calaminici; Andrew J Norton; Lindsey K Goff; Jude Fitzgibbon; Louis M Staudt; T Andrew Lister
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and therapy of Richter's syndrome.

Authors:  Ronan Swords; John Bruzzi; Francis Giles
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Jing Gu; Pek-Lan Khong; Silun Wang; Queenie Chan; Wailun Law; Jingbo Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Prognostic value of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in progressing metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo S P Meirelles; Heiko Schöder; Gregory C Ravizzini; Mithat Gönen; Josef J Fox; John Humm; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  PET scans as a predictive marker of survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minsig Choi; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.