Literature DB >> 31236756

Simultaneous PET/MRI in the Evaluation of Breast and Prostate Cancer Using Combined Na[18F] F and [18F]FDG: a Focus on Skeletal Lesions.

Ida Sonni1, Ryogo Minamimoto1, Lucia Baratto1, Sanjiv S Gambhir2, Andreas M Loening2,3, Shreyas S Vasanawala3,4, Andrei Iagaru5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the performance of sodium 18F]fluoride (Na[18F]F)/2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) simultaneous time-of-flight enabled positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of skeletal metastases in selected patients with advanced breast and prostate cancers. PROCEDURE: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. A total of 74 patients (23 women and 51 men with breast and prostate cancer, respectively) referred for standard-of-care whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent a [99mTc]methyldiphosphonate ([99mTc]MDP) WBBS followed by Na[18F]F/[18F]FDG PET/MRI. Lesions detected by each imaging modality were tabulated and a lesion-based and patient-based analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: On a patient-based analysis, [99mTc]MDP WBBS identified skeletal lesions in 37 patients and PET/MRI in 45 patients. On a lesion-based analysis, WBBS identified a total of 81 skeletal lesions, whereas PET/MRI identified 140 lesions. Additionally, PET/MRI showed extra-skeletal lesions in 19 patients, including lymph nodes (16), prostate (4) lung (3), and liver (2) lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability of Na[18F]F/[18F]FDG PET/MRI to identify more skeletal lesions than 99mTc-MDP WBBS and to additionally identify extra-skeletal disease may be beneficial for patient care and represent an alternative to the single modalities performed separately. Na[18F]F/[18F]FDG PET/MRI is a promising approach for evaluation of skeletal and extra-skeletal lesions in a selected population of breast and prostate cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast and prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Na[18F]F/[18F]FDG PET/MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31236756     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01392-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  35 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Version 2.2015.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Benjamin O Anderson; Ron Balassanian; Sarah L Blair; Harold J Burstein; Amy Cyr; Anthony D Elias; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Matthew Goetz; Lori J Goldstein; Clifford A Hudis; Steven J Isakoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Meena Moran; Sameer A Patel; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Kilian E Salerno; Lee S Schwartzberg; Karen Lisa Smith; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Melinda Telli; John H Ward; Dorothy A Shead; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy.

Authors:  Frank I Lin; Jyotsna E Rao; Erik S Mittra; Kavitha Nallapareddy; Alka Chengapa; David W Dick; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Detection of osseous metastasis by 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT versus CT alone.

Authors:  Srinath C Sampath; Srihari C Sampath; Camila Mosci; Amelie M Lutz; Juergen K Willmann; Erik S Mittra; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 4.  Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET.

Authors:  H Schirrmeister; A Guhlmann; K Elsner; J Kotzerke; G Glatting; M Rentschler; B Neumaier; H Träger; K Nüssle; S N Reske
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Tao Cheng; Wen Xu; Wei-Li Yan; Jia Liu; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for evaluation of malignancy: results of an international multicenter trial.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Erik Mittra; Camila Mosci; David W Dick; Mike Sathekge; Vineet Prakash; Victor Iyer; Paula Lapa; Jorge Isidoro; Joao M de Lima; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Novel strategy for a cocktail 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for evaluation of malignancy: results of the pilot-phase study.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Erik Mittra; Shahriar S Yaghoubi; David W Dick; Andrew Quon; Michael L Goris; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan.

Authors:  Nishikant Avinash Damle; Chandrasekhar Bal; G P Bandopadhyaya; Lalit Kumar; Praveen Kumar; Arun Malhotra; Sneh Lata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 10.  Role of Fludeoxyglucose in Breast Cancer: Treatment Response.

Authors:  David Groheux
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-05-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous PET/MRI in the Evaluation of Breast and Prostate Cancer Using Combined Na[18F]F and [18F]FDG: a Focus on Skeletal Lesions.

Authors:  Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Response to: Letter to the Editors: Re: Simultaneous PET/MRI in the Evaluation of Breast and Prostate Cancer Using Combined Na[18F]F and [18F]FDG: A Focus on Skeletal Lesions.

Authors:  Ida Sonni; Ryogo Minamimoto; Lucia Baratto; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Review of imaging techniques for evaluating morphological and functional responses to the treatment of bone metastases in prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  J Orcajo-Rincon; J Muñoz-Langa; J M Sepúlveda-Sánchez; G C Fernández-Pérez; M Martínez; E Noriega-Álvarez; S Sanz-Viedma; J C Vilanova; A Luna
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.340

4.  What is the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Filiz Çelebi
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Nils Martin Bruckmann; Julian Kirchner; Lale Umutlu; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Robert Seifert; Ken Herrmann; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Christina Antke; Lars Schimmöller; Marc Ingenwerth; Katharina Breuckmann; Andreas Stang; Christian Buchbender; Gerald Antoch; Lino M Sawicki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.