Literature DB >> 26175541

A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Neeta Pandit-Taskar1, Joseph A O'Donoghue2, Jeremy C Durack3, Serge K Lyashchenko4, Sarah M Cheal5, Volkan Beylergil3, Robert A Lefkowitz6, Jorge A Carrasquillo6, Danny F Martinez7, Alex Mak Fung3, Stephen B Solomon6, Mithat Gönen8, Glenn Heller8, Massimo Loda9, David M Nanus10, Scott T Tagawa10, Jarett L Feldman7, Joseph R Osborne6, Jason S Lewis11, Victor E Reuter12, Wolfgang A Weber6, Neil H Bander13, Howard I Scher14, Steven M Larson15, Michael J Morris14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standard imaging for assessing osseous metastases in advanced prostate cancer remains focused on altered bone metabolism and is inadequate for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes. We performed a first-in-human phase I/II study of (89)Zr-DFO-huJ591 ((89)Zr-J591) PET/CT immunoscintigraphy to assess performance characteristics for detecting metastases compared with conventional imaging modalities (CIM) and pathology. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Fifty patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers were injected with 5 mCi of (89)Zr-J591. Whole-body PET/CT scans were obtained, and images were analyzed for tumor visualization. Comparison was made to contemporaneously obtained bone scintigraphy and cross-sectional imaging on a lesion-by-lesion basis and with biopsies of metastatic sites.
RESULTS: Median standardized uptake value for (89)Zr-J591-positive bone lesions (n = 491) was 8.9 and for soft-tissue lesions (n = 90), it was 4.8 (P < 0.00003). (89)Zr-J591 detected 491 osseous sites compared with 339 by MDP and 90 soft-tissue lesions compared with 124 by computed tomography (CT). Compared with all CIMs combined, (89)Zr-J591 detected an additional 99 osseous sites. Forty-six lesions (21 bone and 25 soft tissue) were biopsied in 34 patients; 18 of 19 (89)Zr-J591-positive osseous sites and 14 of 16 (89)Zr-J591-positive soft tissue sites were positive for prostate cancer. The overall accuracy of (89)Zr-J591 was 95.2% (20 of 21) for osseous lesions and 60% (15 of 25) for soft-tissue lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: (89)Zr-J591 imaging demonstrated superior targeting of bone lesions relative to CIMs. Targeting soft-tissue lesions was less optimal, although (89)Zr-J591 had similar accuracy as individual CIMs. This study will provide benchmark data for comparing performance of proposed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting agents for prostate cancer. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26175541      PMCID: PMC4668231          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

1.  The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Hiroji Uemura; Futoshi Sano; Hideyuki Terao; Yoji Nagashima; Shoji Yamanaka; Kazuya Shizukuishi; Ukihide Tateishi; Yoshinobu Kubota; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  18F choline PET/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Larisa Imamovic; Gabriele Broinger; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Franz Stoiber; Michael Nader; Bernhard Gruy; Guenter Janetschek; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  ⁸⁹Zr-huJ591 immuno-PET imaging in patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Volkan Beylergil; Serge Lyashchenko; Shutian Ruan; Stephen B Solomon; Jeremy C Durack; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Robert A Lefkowitz; Mithat Gonen; Jason S Lewis; Jason P Holland; Sarah M Cheal; Victor E Reuter; Joseph R Osborne; Massimo F Loda; Peter M Smith-Jones; Wolfgang A Weber; Neil H Bander; Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  [11C]-choline PET/CT in imaging locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marcello Rodari; Egesta Lopci; Giovanna Pepe; Lidija Antunovic; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur       Date:  2011

5.  Conjugation and radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using the bifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine.

Authors:  Maria J W D Vosjan; Lars R Perk; Gerard W M Visser; Marianne Budde; Paul Jurek; Garry E Kiefer; Guus A M S van Dongen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo.

Authors:  Jason P Holland; Vadim Divilov; Neil H Bander; Peter M Smith-Jones; Steven M Larson; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Current evaluation of the tissue localization and diagnostic utility of prostate specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  G P Murphy; A A Elgamal; S L Su; D G Bostwick; E H Holmes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Phase I trial of yttrium-90-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 for androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew I Milowsky; David M Nanus; Lale Kostakoglu; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley J Goldsmith; Neil H Bander
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  11C-choline PET/CT detects the site of relapse in the majority of prostate cancer patients showing biochemical recurrence after EBRT.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Paolo Castellucci; Tiziano Graziani; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Renzo Mazzarotto; Maria Ntreta; Filippo Lodi; Giuseppe Martorana; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Limits of Tumor Detectability in Nuclear Medicine and PET.

Authors:  Yusuf Emre Erdi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2012-04-01
View more
  68 in total

1.  Current status and future perspectives of PSMA-targeted therapy in Europe: opportunity knocks.

Authors:  A Pfestroff; M Luster; C A Jilg; P J Olbert; C H Ohlmann; M Lassmann; H R Maecke; S Ezziddin; L Bodei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Interventional Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Stephen B Solomon; Francois Cornelis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  IFNγ PET Imaging as a Predictive Tool for Monitoring Response to Tumor Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Heather M Gibson; Brooke N McKnight; Agnes Malysa; Greg Dyson; Wendy N Wiesend; Claire E McCarthy; Joyce Reyes; Wei-Zen Wei; Nerissa T Viola-Villegas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Lacrimal Glands May Represent Organs at Risk for Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate Cancer with [(177)Lu]DKFZ-PSMA-617.

Authors:  Melanie Hohberg; Wolfgang Eschner; Matthias Schmidt; Markus Dietlein; Carsten Kobe; Thomas Fischer; Alexander Drzezga; Markus Wild
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of a [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Joseph A O'Donoghue; Daniel C Danila; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Volkan Beylergil; Sarah M Cheal; Stephen E Fleming; Josef J Fox; Shutian Ruan; Pat B Zanzonico; Govind Ragupathi; Serge K Lyashchenko; Simon P Williams; Howard I Scher; Bernard M Fine; John L Humm; Steven M Larson; Michael J Morris; Jorge A Carrasquillo
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Current and potential future role of PSMA-PET in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Daniel Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Matthias Guckenberger; Philipp A Kaufmann; Thomas Hermanns; Irene A Burger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody.

Authors:  Jorge A Carrasquillo; Bernard M Fine; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Steven M Larson; Stephen E Fleming; Josef J Fox; Sarah M Cheal; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Shutian Ruan; Govind Ragupathi; Serge K Lyashchenko; John L Humm; Howard I Scher; Mithat Gönen; Simon P Williams; Daniel C Danila; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  The therapeutic and diagnostic potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen/glutamate carboxypeptidase II (PSMA/GCPII) in cancer and neurological disease.

Authors:  James C Evans; Meenakshi Malhotra; John F Cryan; Caitriona M O'Driscoll
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  PET imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer: current state of the art and future challenges.

Authors:  S P Rowe; M A Gorin; M E Allaf; K J Pienta; P T Tran; M G Pomper; A E Ross; S Y Cho
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.