OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We have previously described a novel, automated, nonrigid, model-based method for determining the intrascalar position of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays within human temporal bones using clinically available, flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT). We sought to validate this method by correlating results with anatomic microdissection of CI arrays in cadaveric bones. STUDY DESIGN: Basic science. METHODS: Seven adult cadaveric temporal bones were imaged using fpVCT before and after electrode insertion. Using a statistical model of intracochlear anatomy, an active shape model optimization approach was employed to identify the scalae tympani and vestibuli on the preintervention fpVCT. The array position was estimated by identifying its midline on the postintervention scan and superimposing it onto the preintervention images using rigid registration. Specimens were then microdissected to demonstrate the actual array position. RESULTS: Using microdissection as the standard for ascertaining electrode position, automatic identification of the basilar membrane coupled with postintervention fpVCT for electrode position identification accurately depicted the array location in all seven bones. In four specimens, the array remained within the scala tympani; in three, the basilar membrane was breached. CONCLUSIONS: We have anatomically validated this automated method for predicting the intrascalar location of CI arrays using CT. Using this algorithm and pre- and postintervention CT, rapid feedback regarding implant location and expected audiologic outcomes could be obtained in clinical settings.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We have previously described a novel, automated, nonrigid, model-based method for determining the intrascalar position of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays within human temporal bones using clinically available, flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT). We sought to validate this method by correlating results with anatomic microdissection of CI arrays in cadaveric bones. STUDY DESIGN: Basic science. METHODS: Seven adult cadaveric temporal bones were imaged using fpVCT before and after electrode insertion. Using a statistical model of intracochlear anatomy, an active shape model optimization approach was employed to identify the scalae tympani and vestibuli on the preintervention fpVCT. The array position was estimated by identifying its midline on the postintervention scan and superimposing it onto the preintervention images using rigid registration. Specimens were then microdissected to demonstrate the actual array position. RESULTS: Using microdissection as the standard for ascertaining electrode position, automatic identification of the basilar membrane coupled with postintervention fpVCT for electrode position identification accurately depicted the array location in all seven bones. In four specimens, the array remained within the scala tympani; in three, the basilar membrane was breached. CONCLUSIONS: We have anatomically validated this automated method for predicting the intrascalar location of CI arrays using CT. Using this algorithm and pre- and postintervention CT, rapid feedback regarding implant location and expected audiologic outcomes could be obtained in clinical settings.
Authors: W Gstoettner; H Plenk; P Franz; J Hamzavi; W Baumgartner; C Czerny; K Ehrenberger Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: J B Nadol; J Y Shiao; B J Burgess; D R Ketten; D K Eddington; B J Gantz; I Kos; P Montandon; N J Coker; J T Roland; J K Shallop Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Arne H Voie; Barry Brunsden; J Gail Neely; Eugene A Saxon; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Finley Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl Date: 2007-04
Authors: Emily A Tobey; Lana Britt; Ann Geers; Philip Loizou; Betty Loy; Peter Roland; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Charles G Wright Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Meng-Yu Zhu; Hugh D Curtin; Joseph B Nadol Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Theodore R McRackan; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Linsey D Watkins; Alejandro Rivas; Theodore A Schuman; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Alejandro Rivas; Ahmet Cakir; Jacob B Hunter; Robert F Labadie; M Geraldine Zuniga; George B Wanna; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Fitsum A Reda; Theodore R McRackan; Robert F Labadie; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Alex D Sweeney; Jacob B Hunter; Matthew L Carlson; Alejandro Rivas; Marc L Bennett; Rene H Gifford; Jack H Noble; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie; George B Wanna Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Brendan P O'Connell; Jacob B Hunter; René H Gifford; Alejandro Rivas; David S Haynes; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: William G Morrel; Jourdan T Holder; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 3.497