Literature DB >> 32093543

Effect of Scala Tympani Height on Insertion Depth of Straight Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

William G Morrel1, Jourdan T Holder2, Benoit M Dawant3, Jack H Noble3, Robert F Labadie1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies suggest lateral wall (LW) scala tympani (ST) height decreases apically, which may limit insertion depth. No studies have investigated the relationship of LW ST height with translocation rate or location. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Cochlear implant program at tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: LW ST height was measured in preoperative images for patients with straight electrodes. Scalar location, angle of insertion depth (AID), and translocation depth were measured in postoperative images. Audiologic outcomes were tracked.
RESULTS: In total, 177 ears were identified with 39 translocations (22%). Median AID was 443° (interquartile range [IQR], 367°-550°). Audiologic outcomes (126 ears) showed a small, significant correlation between consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word score and AID (r = 0.20, P = .027), although correlation was insignificant if translocation occurred (r = 0.11, P = .553). Translocation did not affect CNC score (P = .335). AID was higher for translocated electrodes (503° vs 445°, P = .004). Median translocation depth was 381° (IQR, 222°-399°). Median depth at which a 0.5-mm electrode would not fit within 0.1 mm of LW was 585° (IQR, 405°-585°). Median depth at which a 0.5-mm electrode would displace the basilar membrane by ≥0.1 mm was 585° (IQR, 518°-765°); this was defined as predicted translocation depth (PTD). Translocation rate was 39% for insertions deeper than PTD and 14% for insertions shallower than PTD (P = .008).
CONCLUSION: AID and CNC are directly correlated for straight electrodes when not translocated. Translocations generally occur around 380° and are more common with deeper insertions due to decreasing LW ST height. Risk of translocation increases significantly after 580°.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implantation; scala tympani height; straight electrodes; translocation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32093543      PMCID: PMC7196032          DOI: 10.1177/0194599820904941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  33 in total

1.  Dimensions of the scala tympani in the human and cat with reference to cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Hatsushika; R K Shepherd; Y C Tong; G M Clark; S Funasaka
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Matthew L Carlson; René H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Scalar localisation of peri-modiolar electrodes and speech perception outcomes.

Authors:  C Shaul; A S Dragovic; A K Stringer; S J O'Leary; R J Briggs
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Automatic graph-based localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2015-11-20

6.  Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT.

Authors:  Yiyuan Zhao; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

7.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography.

Authors:  Theodore A Schuman; Jack H Noble; Charles G Wright; George B Wanna; Benoit Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Statistical shape model segmentation and frequency mapping of cochlear implant stimulation targets in CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Robert F Labadie; Benoît M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

10.  Use of intraoperative CT scanning for quality control assessment of cochlear implant electrode array placement.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Antonio D Schefano; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Matthew R O'Malley; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Jack H Noble; Sandeep A Phatak; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth K Jensen; Michael Hoa; Hung Jeffrey Kim; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

3.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  [Measuring the cochlea using a tablet-based software package: influence of imaging modality and rater background].

Authors:  Lena Weber; Pingling Kwok; Erin M Picou; Christina Wendl; Christopher Bohr; Steven C Marcrum
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 1.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.