Literature DB >> 26908553

Durability of Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation with Conventional-Length Electrodes and Scala Tympani Insertion.

Alex D Sweeney1, Jacob B Hunter1, Matthew L Carlson2, Alejandro Rivas1, Marc L Bennett1, Rene H Gifford3, Jack H Noble4, David S Haynes1, Robert F Labadie1, George B Wanna5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze factors that influence hearing preservation over time in cochlear implant recipients with conventional-length electrode arrays located entirely within the scala tympani. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with planned chart review.
SETTING: Single tertiary academic referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to analyze a subgroup of cochlear implant recipients with residual acoustic hearing. Patients were included in the study only if their electrode arrays remained fully in the scala tympani after insertion and serviceable acoustic hearing (≤80 dB at 250 Hz) was preserved. Electrode array location was verified through a validated radiographic assessment tool. Patients with <6 months of audiologic follow-up were excluded. The main outcome measure was change in acoustic hearing thresholds from implant activation to the last available follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 16 cases met inclusion criteria (median age, 70.6 years; range, 29.4-82.2; 50% female). The average follow-up was 18.0 months (median, 16.1; range, 6.2-36.4). Patients with a lateral wall electrode array were more likely to have stable acoustic thresholds over time (P < .05). Positive correlations were seen between continued hearing loss following activation and larger initial postoperative acoustic threshold shifts, though statistical significance was not achieved. Age, sex, and noise exposure had no significant influence on continued hearing preservation over time.
CONCLUSIONS: To control for hearing loss associated with interscalar excursion during cochlear implantation, the present study evaluated patients only with conventional electrode arrays located entirely within the scala tympani. In this group, the style of electrode array may influence residual hearing preservation over time. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implantation; cochlear trauma; hearing preservation; image guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26908553      PMCID: PMC4965272          DOI: 10.1177/0194599816630545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  35 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implantation: current and future device options.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Sean O McMenomey
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma.

Authors:  Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006

4.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?

Authors:  Ling Zhou; David R Friedmann; Claudiu Treaba; Robert Peng; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.

Authors:  Alex D Sweeney; Matthew L Carlson; Carla V Valenzuela; George B Wanna; Alejandro Rivas; Marc L Bennett; David S Haynes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.

Authors:  Maura K Cosetti; David R Friedmann; Bovey Z Zhu; Selena E Heman-Ackah; Yixin Fang; Robert G Keller; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Effect of both local and systemically administered dexamethasone on long-term hearing and tissue response in a Guinea pig model of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jason Lee; Hudaifa Ismail; Jun Ho Lee; Gordana Kel; Jonathan O'Leary; Amy Hampson; Hayden Eastwood; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Histologic evaluation of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in the human.

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways.

Authors:  Tatsuya Yamasoba; Frank R Lin; Shinichi Someya; Akinori Kashio; Takashi Sakamoto; Kenji Kondo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 3.672

View more
  6 in total

1.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Robert J Yawn; Ashley M Nassiri; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Predictive factors for short- and long-term hearing preservation in cochlear implantation with conventional-length electrodes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Brendan P O'Connell; David O Francis; Rene H Gifford; Jacob B Hunter; Jourdan T Holder; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Timing of Acoustic Hearing Changes After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Megan J Jensen; Heba Isaac; Helin Hernandez; Jacob Oleson; Camille Dunn; Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.970

4.  Evaluation of Outcome Variability Associated With Lateral Wall, Mid-scalar, and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays When Controlling for Preoperative Patient Characteristics.

Authors:  Joshua E Fabie; Robert G Keller; Jonathan L Hatch; Meredith A Holcomb; Elizabeth L Camposeo; Paul R Lambert; Ted A Meyer; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using a Precurved Electrode Array Inserted With an External Sheath.

Authors:  Ashley M Nassiri; Robert J Yawn; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Matthew R O'Malley; Marc L Bennett; Robert F Labadie; Alejandro Rivas
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.