Literature DB >> 10733187

Electrode to modiolus proximity: a fluoroscopic and histologic analysis.

J T Roland1, A J Fishman, G Alexiades, N L Cohen.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the electrode to modiolus proximity of two commonly used electrodes (Nucleus and Clarion) and a new prototype electrode.
BACKGROUND: Theoretical advantages of modiolus-hugging cochlear implant electrodes include reduced stimulus energy requirements, more efficient power management and longer battery life, more discreet ganglion cell population stimulation, and reduced facial nerve stimulation.
METHODS: Fluoroscopic analysis and histologic surface preparation analysis of electrode position and trauma.
RESULTS: The Nucleus straight electrode occupied an outer wall position in the scala tympani. The Clarion electrode occupied a more intermediate position. The actively coiling prototype electrode was modiolus hugging but caused more trauma than the other two electrodes tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal modiolus-hugging atraumatic intracochlear electrode does not currently exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10733187     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80012-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  12 in total

1.  Complication of cochlear implantation surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Mecca; William Wagle; Allison Lupinetti; Steven Parnes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Johan H M Frijns; Jakob Geleijns; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

4.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

5.  Standardization of CT depiction of cochlear implant insertion depth.

Authors:  C C Colby; N W Todd; H R Harnsberger; P A Hudgins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Cochlear implants in children.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; W H Shapiro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-12

7.  Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography.

Authors:  Theodore A Schuman; Jack H Noble; Charles G Wright; George B Wanna; Benoit Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Electrophysiologic consequences of flexible electrode insertions in gerbils with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Oliver Franz Adunka; Omar Awan; John Maxwell Pike; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.