Literature DB >> 3183213

Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills.

Y C Tong1, P A Busby, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Psychophysical studies were conducted on three prelingual and two postlingual cochlear implant patients. Auditory sensations were produced by electrical stimulation of the residual nerve fibers of the auditory nerve by means of a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. The psychophysical performance of the prelinguals was, in general, poorer than that of the postlinguals; prelingual performance was poorer for repetition rate and electrode position identification, gap detection, and durational and numerosity judgments. Improved performance with time, however, was consistently observed for the prelinguals in the above-mentioned psychophysical tasks. There were significant individual differences in the amount of improvement among the three prelinguals. Speech perception studies were also conducted on the three prelingual patients. The speech perception performance of the three prelingual patients was much poorer than that of postlingual patients in general, and was consistent with their poorer psychophysical performance described above.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3183213     DOI: 10.1121/1.396664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

Review 1.  Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; W Zheng; W M DeBello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Assessment of electrode placement and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Theodore R McRackan; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Linsey D Watkins; Alejandro Rivas; Theodore A Schuman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  [Early hearing experience and sensitive developmental periods].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Brian D Buechel; Woongsang Sunwoo; Joseph D Wagner; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

7.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Matthew L Carlson; René H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Robert J Yawn; Ashley M Nassiri; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  A sensitive period for the impact of hearing loss on auditory perception.

Authors:  Bradley N Buran; Emma C Sarro; Francis A M Manno; Ramanjot Kang; Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.