BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine to what extent subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis can improve performance compared with residual native vision in a spatial-motor task. METHODS: High-contrast square stimuli (5.85 cm sides) were displayed in random locations on a 19″ (48.3 cm) touch screen monitor located 12″ (30.5 cm) in front of the subject. Subjects were instructed to locate and touch the square centre with the system on and then off (40 trials each). The coordinates of the square centre and location touched were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent (26/27) of subjects showed a significant improvement in accuracy and 93% (25/27) show a significant improvement in repeatability with the system on compared with off (p<0.05, Student t test). A group of five subjects that had both accuracy and repeatability values <250 pixels (7.4 cm) with the system off (ie, using only their residual vision) was significantly more accurate and repeatable than the remainder of the cohort (p<0.01). Of this group, four subjects showed a significant improvement in both accuracy and repeatability with the system on. CONCLUSION: In a study on the largest cohort of visual prosthesis recipients to date, we found that artificial vision augments information from existing vision in a spatial-motor task. Clinical trials registry no NCT00407602.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine to what extent subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis can improve performance compared with residual native vision in a spatial-motor task. METHODS: High-contrast square stimuli (5.85 cm sides) were displayed in random locations on a 19″ (48.3 cm) touch screen monitor located 12″ (30.5 cm) in front of the subject. Subjects were instructed to locate and touch the square centre with the system on and then off (40 trials each). The coordinates of the square centre and location touched were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent (26/27) of subjects showed a significant improvement in accuracy and 93% (25/27) show a significant improvement in repeatability with the system on compared with off (p<0.05, Student t test). A group of five subjects that had both accuracy and repeatability values <250 pixels (7.4 cm) with the system off (ie, using only their residual vision) was significantly more accurate and repeatable than the remainder of the cohort (p<0.01). Of this group, four subjects showed a significant improvement in both accuracy and repeatability with the system on. CONCLUSION: In a study on the largest cohort of visual prosthesis recipients to date, we found that artificial vision augments information from existing vision in a spatial-motor task. Clinical trials registry no NCT00407602.
Authors: Manjunatha Mahadevappa; James D Weiland; Douglas Yanai; Ione Fine; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; Masako Kuroda; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Kathleen E Finn; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Uday Patel; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Arup Roy; James D Weiland Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Punita Christopher; Jianing Wei; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Uday Patel; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Aleksandra Polosukhina; Jeffrey Litt; Ivan Tochitsky; Joseph Nemargut; Yivgeny Sychev; Ivan De Kouchkovsky; Tracy Huang; Katharine Borges; Dirk Trauner; Russell N Van Gelder; Richard H Kramer Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 17.173