Literature DB >> 16003900

Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects.

Manjunatha Mahadevappa1, James D Weiland, Douglas Yanai, Ione Fine, Robert J Greenberg, Mark S Humayun.   

Abstract

Three test subjects blind from retinitis pigmentosa were implanted with retinal prostheses as part of a FDA-approved clinical trial. The implant consisted of an extraocular unit that contained electronics for wireless data, power, and generation of stimulus current, and an intraocular unit that consisted of 16 platinum stimulating electrodes arranged in a 4 x 4 pattern within a silicone rubber substrate. The array was held to the retina by a small tack. The stimulator was connected to the array by a multiwire cable and was controlled by a computer based external system that allowed precise control over each electrode. Perception thresholds and electrode impedance were obtained on each electrode from the subjects over several months of testing. The electrode distance from the retina was determined from optical coherence tomography imaging of the array and retina. Across all subjects, average thresholds ranged from 24-702 microA (1-ms pulse). The data show that proximity to the retina played a role in determining the threshold and impedance, but only for electrodes that were greater than 0.5 mm from the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16003900     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  40 in total

1.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Shelley I Fried; Aaron C W Lasker; Neal J Desai; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Initiation and stability of pursuit eye movements in simulated retinal prosthesis at different implant locations.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Liancheng Yang; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  An in vitro model of a retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; Masako Kuroda; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Punita Christopher; Jianing Wei; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Uday Patel; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  S F Cogan; T D Plante; J Ehrlich
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

8.  Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina.

Authors:  Shih-Jen Chen; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Roberto Roizenblatt; James Weiland; Mark Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

9.  Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Scott H Greenwald; Alan Horsager; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Virtual wayfinding using simulated prosthetic vision in gaze-locked viewing.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Liancheng Yang; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.