Literature DB >> 19766116

Spatiotemporal aspects of pulsed electrical stimuli on the responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells.

Ralph J Jensen1, Ofer R Ziv, Joseph F Rizzo, Dean Scribner, Lee Johnson.   

Abstract

Implanted intraocular microelectrode arrays are being used to provide sight to individuals who are blind due to photoreceptor degeneration. It is envisioned that this retinal prosthesis will create the illusion of motion by stimulating focal areas of the retina in a sequential fashion through neighboring electrodes, much like the rapid succession of still images in movies and computer animation gives rise to apparent motion. Using a high-density microelectrode array, we examined the extracellularly recorded responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to a bar-shaped electrode array that was stepped at 50 microm increments at different rates across the retina and compared these responses to the responses generated to a similarly shaped light stimulus that was stepped across the retina. When the retina was stimulated at 1 step/s, retinal ganglion cells gave robust bursts of action potentials to both the electrode array and the light stimulus. The responses to the 'moving' electrode array decreased progressively with increasing stepping frequency. At 16 steps/s (highest frequency tested), the number of spikes per sweep and the number of bursts per sweep were reduced 75% and 67% respectively. In contrast, when the retina was stimulated at 16 steps/s with the 'moving' light stimulus, the number of spikes per sweep and the number of bursts per sweep were reduced only 43% and 25% respectively. These findings suggest that simple translation of object motion to sequential stimulation through neighboring electrodes may not be the best way to convey the perception of object motion in a patient with a retinal prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19766116     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  10 in total

1.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Stimulation strategies for selective activation of retinal ganglion cell soma and threshold reduction.

Authors:  Yao-Chuan Chang; Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Mark Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Simultaneous recording of mouse retinal ganglion cells during epiretinal or subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  S L Sim; R J Szalewski; L J Johnson; L E Akah; L E Shoemaker; W B Thoreson; E Margalit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task.

Authors:  A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  High-fidelity reproduction of spatiotemporal visual signals for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Geoffrey A Weiner; Władysław Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  A high-density microelectrode-tissue-microelectrode sandwich platform for application of retinal circuit study.

Authors:  Frank Yang; Chung-Hua Yang; Fu-Min Wang; Ya-Ting Cheng; Chih-Ciao Teng; Li-Jen Lee; Chang-Hao Yang; Long-Sheng Fan
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.