Literature DB >> 26743752

False reaching movements in localization test and effect of auditory feedback in simulated ultra-low vision subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Takao Endo1, Hiroyuki Kanda2, Masakazu Hirota2, Takeshi Morimoto2, Kohji Nishida1, Takashi Fujikado3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of reaching movements with localization tests in subjects with simulated ultra-low vision, and to examine the effectiveness of auditory feedback training in improving the accuracy of the reaching movements.
METHODS: Twenty-one subjects with simulated ultra-low vision and three patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa (RP) were studied with the localization tester. The localization tester had white square targets with a visual angle of 10° that were projected randomly on a computer monitor screen. The subjects or RP patients were instructed to touch the center of the target. Each subject was tested 20 trials. The distance from the center of the target to the point where subjects touched, the deviation, was calculated automatically by the computer. We also examined the effect of auditory feedback on improving the accuracy of reaching movements.
RESULTS: The average angle of deviation in the subjects was not significantly correlated with visual acuity. The points touched by subjects with simulated low vision were located downward and horizontally toward the hand they used. They were condensed around the barycenter of the touched points (paired t tests; *p = 0.037). The touched points of the patients also deviated downward and condensed around the barycenter. The deviations decreased significantly with auditory feedback when trained over 100 trials.
CONCLUSIONS: The subjects with simulated ultra-low vision and the advanced RP patients had false orientations against the position of localized target systematically. An auditory feedback system may help to correct the false orientations for reaching movements in patients with very low vision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; Localization test; Misdirection; Reaching; Ultra-low vision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26743752     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3253-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  28 in total

1.  Elevated vernier acuity thresholds in glaucoma.

Authors:  Allison M McKendrick; Chris A Johnson; Andrew J Anderson; Brad Fortune
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Proprioceptively guided reaching movements in 3D space: effects of age, task complexity and handedness.

Authors:  T S Schaap; T I Gonzales; T W J Janssen; S H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Prevalence of visual impairment in the adult Japanese population by cause and severity and future projections.

Authors:  Masakazu Yamada; Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Chris B Roberts; M Lynne Pezzullo; Katie Yates; Shigeru Takano; Kensaku Miyake; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Spatial aberrations and acuity in strabismus and amblyopia.

Authors:  H E Bedell; M C Flom; R Barbeito
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.

Authors:  J D Fisk; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task.

Authors:  A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Gary S Rubin; Aimee T Broman; Beatriz Muñoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen Turano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

8.  Spatial localization in visual impairment.

Authors:  Ahalya Subramanian; Christine Dickinson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Vernier thresholds and alignment bias in control, suspect, and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  J R Piltz; N V Swindale; S M Drance
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Restricting the field of view: perceptual and performance effects.

Authors:  P L Alfano; G F Michel
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1990-02
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologies.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Light localization with low-contrast targets in a patient implanted with a suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Takao Endo; Takashi Fujikado; Masakazu Hirota; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Gaze Compensation as a Technique for Improving Hand-Eye Coordination in Prosthetic Vision.

Authors:  Samuel A Titchener; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results.

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Samuel A Titchener; Maria Kolic; William G Kentler; Carla J Abbott; David A X Nayagam; Elizabeth K Baglin; Jessica Kvansakul; Nick Barnes; Janine G Walker; Stephanie B Epp; Kiera A Young; Lauren N Ayton; Chi D Luu; Penelope J Allen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.